[Pan-users] Re: Re: 0.92 amd64

[Duncan]

Thomas Stein posted <address@hidden>, excerpted
below,  on Wed, 12 Apr 2006 15:52:35 +0200:

> Well, i used the ebuild. And as i said, the compile process start, but
> at some point, its always the same point, when compiling scorefile.so or
> so, i don't remember exactly everything goes "BANG!" I reported that
> error to http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=128584 but they send me
> to this list. :-) Oh, and by the way, this happens on both of my amd64
> machines. I have one at work and one at home.

It looks like you are running ~amd64 also, but you are a bit behind in a
couple things.  Have you synced and updated recently?  When you update, do
you use emerge --update --deep or just --update?  If you don't use --deep,
that may explain some of the differences, such as automake-1.9.6-r1
instead of my -r2, autoconf-2.59-r6 instead of my -r7, and sandbox-1.2.12
against my 1.2.17.  It's possible there are some fixes there, so I'd
suggest updating those, then trying again.

That still leaves binutils and gcc.  I'm running a masked version of
binutils as required for my masked gcc-4.1.0, so I'm not going to
recommend that you upgrade that far, but a quick check says you should be
able to upgrade to binutils-2.16.1-r2, which is ~amd64.  As with the
above, there may be fixes in the later version, so try upgrading.  We'll
still be running different versions, but you'll be on the latest ~amd64
version, so hopefully with that and the other upgrades, it'll be enough.

I'd guess at this point that one of the above upgrades, automake,
autoconf, sandbox, and binutils, will fix the problem, as it'll update you
to the latest (as of yesterday) ~arch versions of all the toolchain
packages. If not, it starts getting complicated.  =8^( However, best not
worry about that until the simple stuff has been proven not to work.

-- 
Duncan - List replies preferred.   No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master."  Richard Stallman in
http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html