[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Pan-users] Re: Re: Re: 0.92 amd64
From: |
Duncan |
Subject: |
[Pan-users] Re: Re: Re: 0.92 amd64 |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Apr 2006 02:05:11 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Pan/0.14.2.91 (As She Crawled Across the Table) |
Thomas Stein posted <address@hidden>, excerpted
below, on Thu, 13 Apr 2006 09:32:53 +0200:
> On Wednesday 12 April 2006 17:27, Duncan wrote:
>
>> I'd guess at this point that one of the above upgrades, automake,
>> autoconf, sandbox, and binutils, will fix the problem,
>
> Done. But......same error.
>
> This is the point where the compilation stops:
>
> ----
> then mv -f ".deps/scorefile-test.Tpo" ".deps/scorefile-test.Po"; else
> rm -f ".deps/scorefile-test.Tpo"; exit 1; fi
> ----
>
> And this are the running processes i was able to kill before my machine gets
> killed. :-)
>
> ----
> root 7766 0.0 0.0 5276 952 ? S 09:27
> 0:00 /usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/gcc-bin/3.4.6/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-g++
> -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I../.. -I/usr/include/gmime-2.0
> -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib64/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/glib-2.0
> -I/usr/lib64/glib-2.0/include -march=k8 -O2 -pipe -MT
> scorefile-test.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/scorefile-test.Tpo -c -o scorefile-test.o
> scorefile-test.cc
> root 7767 99.2 42.9 901696 885496 ? R 09:27
> 0:37 /usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.6/cc1plus -quiet -I. -I.
> -I../.. -I../.. -I/usr/include/gmime-2.0 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0
> -I/usr/lib64/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/glib-2.0
> -I/usr/lib64/glib-2.0/include -MD
> scorefile-test.d -MF .deps/scorefile-test.Tpo -MP -MT scorefile-test.o -MQ
> scorefile-test.o -D_GNU_SOURCE -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
> scorefile-test.cc -quiet -dumpbase scorefile-test.cc -march=k8 -auxbase-strip
> scorefile-test.o -O2 -o -
> root 7768 0.0 0.1 8004 2180 ? S 09:27
> 0:00
> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.6/../../../../x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/as
> -Qy -o
> scorefile-test.o -
> ----
>
> I think we have a problem. :-)
Well, I just remerged binutils with the multislot flag, then merged latest
~amd64 binutils (2.16.1-r2), and I have gcc-3.4.6 already merged but don't
use it much, so I think I can pretty much duplicate your toolchain now.
What USE flags did you (previously) use when compiling PAN (the new one
doesn't have USE flags). nls? spell? Here, I'm -nls, +spell. Do you
have the latest GTK/Gnome dependencies merged? Try an --update --deep
--pretend at least, and check that you have the below versions.
Meanwhile, I'm going to eselect compiler and eselect binutils to the
versions you have and see if pan-0.92 still builds here. I regularly use
--update --deep --newuse when I update, and keep up with revdep-rebuild
and emerge --depclean to keep the backend stuff uptodate and cleaned out,
so I /know/ I'm uptodate (as of yesterday, haven't updated today yet).
For reference, here's the versions of those packages I have. They should
be what you have or will have after updates, baring any very recent
changes:
libgnome-2.12.0.1
libbonobo-2.10.1
glib-2.8.6
gtk+-2.8.13
pango-1.10.4
atk-1.10.3
orbit-2.12.5
gnome-vfs-2.12.2
libpcre-6.6
gtkspell-2.0.11-r1
Also run a revdep-rebuild -p, after checking the above and upgrading where
necessary, and then rebuilding anything revdep-rebuild says you may
need to (either one at a time as I usually do, using the --oneshot
paramater so I don't pollute my world file, or revdep-rebuild without the
-p).
As I said, eventually, you should have very close to what I have, such
that when I configure to use the same gcc and binutils you have and run
the merge, I should get very similar results. We'll see.
--
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman in
http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html
- [Pan-users] 0.92 amd64, Thomas Stein, 2006/04/12
- [Pan-users] Re: 0.92 amd64, Duncan, 2006/04/12
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: Re: 0.92 amd64, Thomas Fricke, 2006/04/13
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: Re: 0.92 amd64, Thomas Stein, 2006/04/13
- [Pan-users] Re: Re: Re: 0.92 amd64, Duncan, 2006/04/14
- [Pan-users] Re: Re: Re: 0.92 amd64, Duncan, 2006/04/14
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: Re: Re: 0.92 amd64, Thomas Stein, 2006/04/18
- [Pan-users] Re: Re: Re: Re: 0.92 amd64, Duncan, 2006/04/18
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: Re: Re: Re: 0.92 amd64, Thomas Stein, 2006/04/18
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: Re: Re: Re: 0.92 amd64, Thomas Stein, 2006/04/24