[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Pan-users] Policy discussion: GNKSA
From: |
Duncan |
Subject: |
Re: [Pan-users] Policy discussion: GNKSA |
Date: |
Sun, 3 Jul 2011 13:21:27 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Pan/0.135 (Tomorrow I'll Wake Up and Scald Myself with Tea; GIT 9996aa7 branch-master) |
Rhialto posted on Sun, 03 Jul 2011 15:09:22 +0200 as excerpted:
> On Sun 03 Jul 2011 at 11:03:41 +0000, Duncan wrote:
>> So I'd prefer to keep the 4-connections GUI cap and the 100% GNKSA seal
>> of approval, but it's nothing I feel incredibly strongly about,
>> certainly not like top posting or HTML or the like.
>
> I tend to agree. And it's an easy enough change to revert anyway.
> (It could even be made a configure option, default to 4, for those who
> want to break the seal)
Well, it's already a config option. But the current gui max for that
option is 4 connections in accordance with GNKSA. What we're talking
about is whether we raise the GUI cap on that option, thus breaking GNKSA,
or not. People could still set as few or as many as they want, up to
whatever the cap is in the GUI, or as many as they want beyond the cap
editing the config file directly, whatever we choose. The only specific
thing we're debating is whether the GUI connection config max should be
four, or bust thru GNKSA, and go higher. But even if we go with
HMueller's 20 (or even go 100!), a user can still set only four if they
want, thus not breaking GNKSA themselves. But pan wouldn't get that seal
any more.
--
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
- [Pan-users] Policy discussion: GNKSA, Duncan, 2011/07/03
- Re: [Pan-users] Policy discussion: GNKSA, Travis, 2011/07/03
- Re: [Pan-users] Policy discussion: GNKSA, Travis, 2011/07/03
- Re: [Pan-users] Policy discussion: GNKSA, Alan Meyer, 2011/07/03
- Re: [Pan-users] Policy discussion: GNKSA, Travis, 2011/07/03