Re: [Pan-users] Policy discussion: GNKSA

[Travis]

-----Original Message----- 
From: George Czerw
Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2011 8:01 AM
To: address@hidden
Subject: Re: [Pan-users] Policy discussion: GNKSA

> On Sunday, July 03, 2011 10:37:03 am Travis wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Duncan
> Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2011 4:03 AM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: [Pan-users] Policy discussion: GNKSA
>
> Looking at HMueller's git logs, I'm guessing he had no clue on pan's
> history and GNKSA when he did the following commit (log excerpt, there
> was more to the commit but this is the pertinent part for us):
>
> commit 9f3b662bb94474c833a0c1af4d1a265e83279cd1
> Author: Heinrich Müller <address@hidden>
> Date:   Mon Jun 27 10:19:22 2011 +0200
>
>     [+] changed max connections to 20
>
> <snip>
>
> The four connections limit is a MUST (not a should), listed under 
> point
> #19, "Be kind to servers, leave room for others".  As a MUST, if pan
> elects to change the GUI, pan fails a MUST and therefore scores an
> automatic fail.  100% compliant to full fail in one commit!
>
> <snip>
>
> GNKSA is pretty specific, 4 connections max, and it's a MUST, but
> there's
> an existing workaround for those who want it.
>
> <snip>
>
> I vote to keep the GNKSA stamp.
> As Duncan said it is very easy to modify even for a old non Linux
> windows guy like me.
> --
>
> Travis in Shoreline Washington
>
>
> _______________________________________________


I agree with Travis, keep the GNKSA stamp.
I can't imagine why anyone would really NEED more than 4 connections.

George in Noo Joisey

With fiber (FiOS) internet (25mb up and down) and using Giganews to 
download binaries it is nice to use more than 4 connections.
--

Travis in Shoreline Washington