[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Pan-users] Policy discussion: GNKSA
From: |
Duncan |
Subject: |
Re: [Pan-users] Policy discussion: GNKSA |
Date: |
Sun, 3 Jul 2011 15:08:56 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Pan/0.135 (Tomorrow I'll Wake Up and Scald Myself with Tea; GIT 9996aa7 branch-master) |
Rhialto posted on Sun, 03 Jul 2011 15:35:32 +0200 as excerpted:
> On Sun 03 Jul 2011 at 13:21:27 +0000, Duncan wrote:
>> Rhialto posted on Sun, 03 Jul 2011 15:09:22 +0200 as excerpted:
>>
>> > On Sun 03 Jul 2011 at 11:03:41 +0000, Duncan wrote:
>> >> So I'd prefer to keep the 4-connections GUI cap and the 100% GNKSA
>> >> seal of approval, but it's nothing I feel incredibly strongly about,
>> >> certainly not like top posting or HTML or the like.
>> >
>> > I tend to agree. And it's an easy enough change to revert anyway.
>> > (It could even be made a configure option, default to 4, for those
>> > who want to break the seal)
>>
>> Well, it's already a config option. But the current gui max for that
>
> I meant a compile time option to the configure script. If given, a
> warning could be included somewhere about breaking GNKSA.
Ahh. <The light dawns...> Makes sense now. =:^)
--
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
- [Pan-users] Policy discussion: GNKSA, Duncan, 2011/07/03
- Re: [Pan-users] Policy discussion: GNKSA, Travis, 2011/07/03
- Re: [Pan-users] Policy discussion: GNKSA, Travis, 2011/07/03
- Re: [Pan-users] Policy discussion: GNKSA, Alan Meyer, 2011/07/03
- Re: [Pan-users] Policy discussion: GNKSA, Travis, 2011/07/03
- [Pan-users] HNKSA (was Re: Policy discussion: GNKSA), Ron Johnson, 2011/07/03
- Re: [Pan-users] Policy discussion: GNKSA, Steven D'Aprano, 2011/07/04