[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Pan-users] Policy discussion: GNKSA
From: |
Travis |
Subject: |
Re: [Pan-users] Policy discussion: GNKSA |
Date: |
Sun, 3 Jul 2011 07:37:03 -0700 |
-----Original Message-----
From: Duncan
Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2011 4:03 AM
To: address@hidden
Subject: [Pan-users] Policy discussion: GNKSA
Looking at HMueller's git logs, I'm guessing he had no clue on pan's
history and GNKSA when he did the following commit (log excerpt, there
was more to the commit but this is the pertinent part for us):
commit 9f3b662bb94474c833a0c1af4d1a265e83279cd1
Author: Heinrich Müller <address@hidden>
Date: Mon Jun 27 10:19:22 2011 +0200
[+] changed max connections to 20
<snip>
The four connections limit is a MUST (not a should), listed under point
#19, "Be kind to servers, leave room for others". As a MUST, if pan
elects to change the GUI, pan fails a MUST and therefore scores an
automatic fail. 100% compliant to full fail in one commit!
<snip>
GNKSA is pretty specific, 4 connections max, and it's a MUST, but
there's
an existing workaround for those who want it.
<snip>
I vote to keep the GNKSA stamp.
As Duncan said it is very easy to modify even for a old non Linux
windows guy like me.
--
Travis in Shoreline Washington
- [Pan-users] Policy discussion: GNKSA, Duncan, 2011/07/03
- Re: [Pan-users] Policy discussion: GNKSA,
Travis <=
- Re: [Pan-users] Policy discussion: GNKSA, Travis, 2011/07/03
- Re: [Pan-users] Policy discussion: GNKSA, Alan Meyer, 2011/07/03
- Re: [Pan-users] Policy discussion: GNKSA, Travis, 2011/07/03
- [Pan-users] HNKSA (was Re: Policy discussion: GNKSA), Ron Johnson, 2011/07/03
- Re: [Pan-users] Policy discussion: GNKSA, Steven D'Aprano, 2011/07/04
- Re: [Pan-users] Policy discussion: GNKSA, Alan Meyer, 2011/07/04