[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: TeX-documentation-texdoc
From: |
Ikumi Keita |
Subject: |
Re: TeX-documentation-texdoc |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Jan 2023 15:57:24 +0900 |
Hi Arash,
>>>>> Arash Esbati <arash@gnu.org> writes:
> thanks for looking at this. I have one question: Would it make sense to
> move the (executable-find "texdoc") further up in the function body?
Yes, I think that it would make sense well. I honored the following
comment in the former half of the defun, but it doesn't seem much
important for me actually.
,----
| ;; Note: `shell-command-to-string' uses shell, only
| ;; `call-process' looks at `exec-path', thus only here makes
| ;; sense to use `executable-find' to test whether texdoc is
| ;; available.
`----
Thus I'm fine to follow your suggestion.
Regards,
Ikumi Keita
#StandWithUkraine #StopWarInUkraine
- Re: TeX-documentation-texdoc, (continued)
- Re: TeX-documentation-texdoc, Ikumi Keita, 2023/01/23
- Re: TeX-documentation-texdoc, Greg Bognar, 2023/01/23
- Re: TeX-documentation-texdoc, Ikumi Keita, 2023/01/24
- Re: TeX-documentation-texdoc, Greg Bognar, 2023/01/24
- Re: TeX-documentation-texdoc, Ikumi Keita, 2023/01/26
- Re: TeX-documentation-texdoc, Arash Esbati, 2023/01/26
- Re: TeX-documentation-texdoc, Ikumi Keita, 2023/01/27
- Re: TeX-documentation-texdoc, Arash Esbati, 2023/01/27
- Re: TeX-documentation-texdoc, Ikumi Keita, 2023/01/28
- Re: TeX-documentation-texdoc, Arash Esbati, 2023/01/24
- Re: TeX-documentation-texdoc,
Ikumi Keita <=