Re: [avrdude-dev] Documentation build tools requirements - many complaints

[Joerg Wunsch]

As E. Weddington wrote:

> Oh, heck, it looks like it's been under our noses after all:
> OpenOffice.org <http://www.zzoss.com/projects/oowdbk/>

Hmm, I'm not particular fond of OO.o (or that kind of tools in
general), but perhaps it's really an idea.  After all, OO.o operates
as an XML editor by default.  As long as it doesn't poison the
generated docbook files with hard offsets etc. (as it does for the
generated OO.o XML documents), it might work.

One thing I hope can't be arranged for is a decent indenting.  OO.o
XML documents itself aren't indented at all, everything is there
within a single line. :-/  (Apart from that, the ability to edit
their XML code directly in Emacs has already been quite helpful to
me a number of times.)

-- 
cheers, J"org               .-.-.   --... ...--   -.. .  DL8DTL

http://www.sax.de/~joerg/                        NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)