[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [certi-dev] FlightGear FOM
From: |
Martin Spott |
Subject: |
Re: [certi-dev] FlightGear FOM |
Date: |
Mon, 25 May 2009 16:01:00 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
tin/1.9.3-20080506 ("Dalintober") (UNIX) (Linux/2.6.29.3 (x86_64)) |
Hi Petr,
"Gotthard, Petr" wrote:
> As a first step I thus want to focus on a basic interoperability between
> the 3 major flight simulators (FGFS, MS FSX, X-Plane) based on the plain
> RPR/ASN. During this activity we should analyze what details are
> available in different simulators and later suggest the FOM extensions
> that suits all three simulators. This way we may reach the maximal
> interoperability and avoid developing yet another FlightGear
> multiplayer.
>
> Volunteers? ;-)
I'm very much addicted to the idea of getting FlightGear together with
X-Plane and M$FS into a single simulation environment - last but not
least because this would answer a question we're regularly being asked
whenever the present FlightGear on a public show. So far I'm aware of
the following (commercial) HLA interfaces for X-Plane and MSFS:
X-Plane on Windows: http://www.memention.com/hlaxp/
MSFS: http://www.permian.com.au/products/flight_sim/
MSFS: http://www.acroneng.com/SimX.htm
Acron explicitly state that they're basing on the RPR FOM, Memention
state that they're using their own, Permian doesn't make any public
statement at all.
I neither own a Windows license (just one that runs on my little
netbook) nor do I have a licensed copy of MSFS or X-Plane, I don't even
have a second PeeCee .... just a little PowerMac which is way to slow
to run any simulation. I might get my hands on this sort of stuff and
try to get the Acron plug-in running, yet I don't know how long it
would take ....
BTW, we're in the process to develop an OpenSource ATC voice
communication system based on Asterisk - just to complete the picture.
We'll see,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Re: [certi-dev] FlightGear simulation latency, (continued)
- Re: [certi-dev] FlightGear simulation latency, Martin Spott, 2009/05/23
- RE: [certi-dev] FlightGear simulation latency, Gotthard, Petr, 2009/05/23
- Re: [certi-dev] FlightGear simulation latency, Martin Spott, 2009/05/23
- RE: [certi-dev] FlightGear simulation latency, Gotthard, Petr, 2009/05/23
- Re: [certi-dev] FlightGear simulation latency, Martin Spott, 2009/05/24
- Re: [certi-dev] FlightGear simulation latency, Martin Spott, 2009/05/25
- RE: [certi-dev] FlightGear FOM, Gotthard, Petr, 2009/05/25
- Re: [certi-dev] FlightGear FOM,
Martin Spott <=
- Re: [certi-dev] FlightGear FOM, Jon Stockill, 2009/05/25
- Re: [certi-dev] FlightGear FOM, Martin Spott, 2009/05/25
- Re: [certi-dev] FlightGear FOM, Eric Noulard, 2009/05/25
- Re: [certi-dev] FlightGear FOM, Martin Spott, 2009/05/25
- Re: [certi-dev] FlightGear FOM, Martin Spott, 2009/05/25
- Re: [certi-dev] FlightGear FOM, Eric Noulard, 2009/05/26
- RE: [certi-dev] FlightGear FOM / Java interface, Gotthard, Petr, 2009/05/26
- Re: [certi-dev] FlightGear FOM / Java interface, Eric Noulard, 2009/05/26
- Re: [certi-dev] FlightGear FOM / Java interface, Martin Spott, 2009/05/27
- Re: [certi-dev] FlightGear FOM / Java interface, Eric Noulard, 2009/05/27