Re: [certi-dev] FlightGear FOM / Java interface

[Martin Spott]

"Gotthard, Petr" wrote:

>> Yup, I know about Portico, but adding the entire Portico RTI to the
>> game plus a CERTI bridge would make the entire thing a bit bloated and
>> a lot more complex. I suspect that our friendly primary author would
>> rather implement CERTI's wire protocol in Java himself than plugging
>> yet another beast into the queue.
> 
> Implementing CERTI's wire protocol is one option, but such solution
> would not be interoperable with other RTI (like MAK). This may thus
> block commercial MAK RTI based applications from connecting to the
> simulation.

Absolutely. I mentioned the idea of implementing the wire protocol just
as a last resort before people start coupling various RTI's together as
a bridge,

        Martin.
-- 
 Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------