discuss-gnustep
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Cocotron


From: Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf
Subject: Re: Cocotron
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 05:33:36 +0100


Am 29.12.2006 um 16:36 schrieb Gregory John Casamento:

I believe that renaming is a good idea. It would make it clearer what's what. We'll need, of course, to do it when we have a release which breaks backwards compatibility.

How about keeping symlinks for the existing stuff being created to ensure that?



Later, GJC

regards, Lars

--
Gregory Casamento
## GNUstep Chief Maintainer

----- Original Message ----
From: Richard Frith-Macdonald <address@hidden>
To: Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf <address@hidden>
Cc: Gregory John Casamento <address@hidden>; "address@hidden" <address@hidden>; address@hidden
Sent: Friday, December 29, 2006 3:05:31 AM
Subject: Re: Cocotron


On 29 Dec 2006, at 01:37, Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf wrote:


Am 28.12.2006 um 17:37 schrieb Gregory John Casamento:

Nikolaus,

They would be wrong.   GNUstep not an OS.

They might be wrong, but it's not their fault. If we want people to
get it right we'll have to explain it to them in a catchy way -
even if that might include to rename gnustep-base to gnustep-
foundation and gnustep-gui to gnustep-appkit.

I actually have no problem at all with the idea of renaming ... in
fact, for compatibility it might be nice if we could build them so
that they could be used both as libraries and frameworks at the same
time, so that cocoa developers could link to them the same way they
do on macos.  I don't know how to modify makefiles etc to build them
that way, but it can't really be all that hard.


_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnustep mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnustep








reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]