[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] hook questions
From: |
Robert Collins |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] hook questions |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Jan 2004 14:41:44 +1100 |
On Thu, 2004-01-15 at 10:06, Dustin Sallings wrote:
> Since the default output of parse-package-name provide the exact
> output I need for what I'm doing, I'm trying to decide whether it would
> better to have the stuff pre-parsed for hooks. In order to get the
> four parts of the revision variable that's passed in separated, I'd
> have to write four lines of hook and fork four times.
>
hooks aren't perf critical. So fork is irrelevant. And it used to be
separate things, having it combined and consistent is good.
Rob
--
GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- [Gnu-arch-users] hook questions, Dustin Sallings, 2004/01/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] hook questions, Tom Lord, 2004/01/14
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] hook questions, Robert Collins, 2004/01/14
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] hook questions, Dustin Sallings, 2004/01/14
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] hook questions, Robert Collins, 2004/01/14
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] hook questions, Dustin Sallings, 2004/01/14
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] hook questions, Robert Collins, 2004/01/14
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] hook questions, Dustin Sallings, 2004/01/14
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] hook questions, Robert Collins, 2004/01/14