[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution |
Date: |
Sun, 19 Feb 2012 19:42:30 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) |
Graham Percival <address@hidden> writes:
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 07:27:31PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
>> So if it is not too much work to collect triplets of "version #, before,
>> after convert-ly, after correct change", it might be a nice base for
>> looking how to improve the convertrules file.
>
> David, are you volunteering to produce patches for convert-ly?
If they are reasonably simple to do.
> If not, let's not ask Thomas to do something which would be useless.
> Other than possibly yourself, there is no appetite for spending energy
> on convert-ly. There's no point collecting bug reports about it.
There is no appetite for spending energy on users asking about a
gazillion files in Mutopia that stopped working, either. It's not that
we have much of a choice.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: polychords: a working solution, (continued)
- Re: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/18
- Re: polychords: a working solution, Graham Percival, 2012/02/18
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Phil Holmes, 2012/02/19
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/02/19
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Jean-Alexis Montignies, 2012/02/19
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/19
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Kastrup, 2012/02/19
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/19
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Kastrup, 2012/02/19
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Graham Percival, 2012/02/19
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/19
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Kastrup, 2012/02/20
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/02/20
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/02/21
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Kastrup, 2012/02/21
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/02/21
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Kastrup, 2012/02/21
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Kastrup, 2012/02/21
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/02/21
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Kastrup, 2012/02/21