|
From: | Piero 74 |
Subject: | Re: [lwip-users] socket functionality - nonblocking? |
Date: | Tue, 25 Nov 2008 14:43:45 +0100 |
On Tue, November 25, 2008 11:23, Piero 74 wrote:> yes... it's possible... i use it in my code... my task loop using a ..
> 2008/11/25 Kieran Mansley <address@hidden>
>> I'm not sure if you can put a listening socket in the
>> readable set and get notified when a new connection arrives either -
> It works very well.
Thanks guys!
I understand that there are reasons for not supporting non-blocked io, but
are there any plans or work in progress regarding this? Or doesn't the
current infrastructure lend it self to this easily?
I guess it must have been discussed before. I saw some old posts about a
socket2.c?
I am now at the cross section with the sign saying Left "lwip" Right
"commercial IP stack". :)
If I choose lwip, I guess I will have to either do some implementation
outside the socket layer, or try to help the development of lwip in the
non-blocking way.
Background:
I like the socket api, because of its portability, and almost all my
designs are a bunch of nodes that has open connections to many other,
non-blocking is crucial for me. In this design, I would use lwip with
freertos.org on an NXP arm7tdmi.
Micael
_______________________________________________
lwip-users mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |