[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Om-synth] Re: om-synth -lo_address_get_url error
From: |
Florian Schmidt |
Subject: |
Re: [Om-synth] Re: om-synth -lo_address_get_url error |
Date: |
Fri, 14 Apr 2006 13:09:47 +0200 |
On Thu, 13 Apr 2006 22:48:47 -0400
Dave Robillard <address@hidden> wrote:
> A: Because it screws up the flow of conversation
> Q: Why is top posting bad?
>
> Everything is confusing and unreadable when the replies are all over the
> place, and reading threads gets incredibly irritating. Thus one way to
> post replies is needed, and normal readable chronological order is the
> most sensible one for obvious reasons.
>
> More importantly than any sort of rational argument, however: I said
> so. :)
Plus: most people with usenet/email-list experience agree, including me.
And what the majority said, must be right ;)
Flo
--
Palimm Palimm!
http://tapas.affenbande.org
- Re: [Om-synth] Re: om-synth -lo_address_get_url error, (continued)
- Re: [Om-synth] Re: om-synth -lo_address_get_url error, Dave Robillard, 2006/04/13
- Re: [Om-synth] Re: om-synth -lo_address_get_url error, njcross, 2006/04/13
- Re: [Om-synth] Re: om-synth -lo_address_get_url error, Dave Robillard, 2006/04/13
- Re: [Om-synth] Re: om-synth -lo_address_get_url error, njcross, 2006/04/13
- Re: [Om-synth] Re: om-synth -lo_address_get_url error, Lars Luthman, 2006/04/13
- Re: [Om-synth] Re: om-synth -lo_address_get_url error, njcross, 2006/04/13
- Re: [Om-synth] Re: om-synth -lo_address_get_url error, Dave Robillard, 2006/04/13
- Re: [Om-synth] Re: om-synth -lo_address_get_url error,
Florian Schmidt <=
- Re: [Om-synth] Re: om-synth -lo_address_get_url error, Dave Robillard, 2006/04/12
- Re: [Om-synth] Re: om-synth -lo_address_get_url error, njcross, 2006/04/12