[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Pan-users] testers needed -- and if you use alt.binaries, you *want
From: |
Brad Sims |
Subject: |
Re: [Pan-users] testers needed -- and if you use alt.binaries, you *want* to try this... |
Date: |
Wed, 9 Mar 2005 17:54:36 -0600 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.7.2 |
On Wednesday 09 March 2005 2:42 pm, Charles Kerr wrote:
> I've been playing with it for a few days now and these gains seem to
> have no downside, so if anyone else wants to give it a spin, I'd very
> much like to get more people testing this out.
Ok this is weird... I tried to do the autogen.sh and it's
screaming thusly:
<begin error log>
address@hidden:~/pan$ ./autogen.sh
/usr/bin/gnome-autogen.sh
checking for autoconf >= 2.53...
testing autoconf2.50... found 2.59
checking for automake >= 1.4...
testing automake-1.4... not found.
***Error***: You must have automake >= 1.4 installed
to build Pan. Download the appropriate package for
from your distribution or get the source tarball at
http://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/automake/automake-1.4.tar.gz
checking for glib-gettext >= 2.2.0...
testing glib-gettextize... found 2.6.3
checking for intltool >= 0.30...
testing intltoolize... found 0.33
checking for pkg-config >= 0.14.0...
testing pkg-config... found 0.15.0
/usr/bin/gnome-autogen.sh: line 154: --print-ac-dir: command not found
Checking for required M4 macros...
glib-gettext.m4 not found
intltool.m4 not found
pkg.m4 not found
Checking for forbidden M4 macros...
***Error***: some autoconf macros required to build Pan
were not found in your aclocal path, or some forbidden
macros were found. Perhaps you need to adjust your
ACLOCAL_FLAGS?
</end error log>
I have automake 1.7.9 installed via Debian Sid; and automake is where it
should be /usr/bin/automake... so what exactly is the problem? Do I need
to downgrade to automake 1.4.n?
--
"First read that as "steaming media."
Makes sense that way too.'' -- Ron Parker
- [Pan-users] testers needed -- and if you use alt.binaries, you *want* to try this..., Charles Kerr, 2005/03/09
- Re: [Pan-users] testers needed -- and if you use alt.binaries, you *want* to try this...,
Brad Sims <=
- Re: [Pan-users] testers needed -- and if you use alt.binaries, you *want* to try this..., Jim Reiss, 2005/03/09
- Re: [Pan-users] testers needed -- and if you use alt.binaries, you *want* to try this..., Brad Sims, 2005/03/10
- Re: [Pan-users] testers needed -- and if you use alt.binaries, you *want* to try this..., Robert Marshall, 2005/03/10
- Re: [Pan-users] testers needed -- and if you use alt.binaries, you *want* to try this..., Brad Sims, 2005/03/11
- Re: [Pan-users] testers needed -- and if you use alt.binaries, you *want* to try this..., Artur Jachacy, 2005/03/12
- [Pan-users] Re: testers needed -- and if you use alt.binaries, you *want* to try this..., Duncan, 2005/03/12
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: testers needed -- and if you use alt.binaries, you *want* to try this..., Brad Sims, 2005/03/12
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: testers needed -- and if you use alt.binaries, you *want* to try this..., Rinaldi J. Montessi, 2005/03/12
- Re: [Pan-users] testers needed -- and if you use alt.binaries, you *want* to try this..., charles, 2005/03/13