Re: [Unity-irc3] DNS, identd, ...

[David Westley]

so like...

Access Level 0 = no access (banned)
Access Level 1 = access
etc...and you could mix and match the masks like with the current +s umode so 
like to make someone get auto opped but not be able to kick people you'd give 
them an access level of 7 which would be level 1 (access) + level 2 (auto) + 
level 4 (op) yeah?

David

-----Original Message-----
From: Jan Krueger <address@hidden>
To: "irc3 (Unity) public discussion" <address@hidden>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 15:07:50 +0100
Subject: Re: [Unity-irc3] DNS, identd, ...

> On Thu, 13 Mar 2003 13:24:08 +0000, David Westley <address@hidden> wrote
> this:
> > What about banning address@hidden and the server internally going that
> > ban matches UserA so stop UserA from joining/speaking on channel if not
> > voiced or opped? same with ignore lists, that way people would be secure
> but
> > still be banable yeah?
> > 
> > David
> 
> Do you mean "cloak all users' hosts" or "don't show hosts at all"? In both
> cases this won't help users setting a ban since they won't be able to know
> who will get banned, unless we use bahamut-style cloaking.
> By the way, stop staying so close to the IRC protocol. ;) We can add
> something
> new for muting people on a channel; it's not very intuitive to use bans for
> that. In fact, I'd like to make everything that's related to channel access
> mask style, i.e. you could specify "address@hidden - access level 5" or
> something like that.
> 
> -- 
> regards,
> Jan Krüger
> http://www.jast-dev.net.tc
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> irc3 (Unity) public discussion mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/unity-irc3