Re: [Unity-irc3] Channel access (was: DNS, identd, ...)

[David Westley]

I know a fair bit about the way ChanServs' access levels work.

Yeah I agree it is alot more powerful if it's done right for example you can 
give someone ops but not let them kick people or give someone voice and allow 
them to kick people like halfops but without the halfop thing...makes for a 
much finer grain of control over what people can and cannot do :)

LOL sorry....it's this web-based client I'm using while I'm at work..it works 
*most of the time* but sometimes says "Couldn't send message" so I send it 
again only to find that it lied to me and did send it!! :)

David

-----Original Message-----
From: Jan Krueger <address@hidden>
To: "irc3 (Unity) public discussion" <address@hidden>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 15:34:52 +0100
Subject: [Unity-irc3] Channel access (was: DNS, identd, ...)

> On Thu, 13 Mar 2003 14:25:02 +0000, David Westley <address@hidden> wrote
> this:
> > so like...
> > 
> > Access Level 0 = no access (banned)
> > Access Level 1 = access
> > etc...and you could mix and match the masks like with the current +s umode
> > so like to make someone get auto opped but not be able to kick people you'd
> > give them an access level of 7 which would be level 1 (access) + level 2
> > (auto) + level 4 (op) yeah?
> That's about what I was thinking. I have a very clear idea of what it's gonna
> look like... do you know access levels on ChanServ and the like? I like those
> and if you do it the right way, it's a LOT more poweful than the classic +ovb
> and so on.
> 
> PS. stop sending everything twice ;)
> 
> -- 
> regards,
> Jan Krüger
> http://www.jast-dev.net.tc
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> irc3 (Unity) public discussion mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/unity-irc3