[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: next-error-last-buffer
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: next-error-last-buffer |
Date: |
Sat, 15 May 2004 04:53:36 -0400 |
Is this the change you want?
"Perhaps next-error should always choose a compilation or occur buffer
that is visible in a window, rather than one that isn't. And it
should prefer one that is visible in the current frame to one that is
visible in another frame. This might help us get a better default
behavior."
Yes, that's what I think we should try first. This will make the more
natural choice in many cases, and will give people a natural way to
choose which compilation or occur buffer to use. Perhaps when people
get used to this there will not be a need for further changes.
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, (continued)
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/13
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Miles Bader, 2004/05/13
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Stefan Monnier, 2004/05/13
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/13
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Miles Bader, 2004/05/13
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/05/13
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/14
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/05/14
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/15
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/15
- Re: next-error-last-buffer,
Richard Stallman <=
Re: next-error-last-buffer, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/24
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/05/24
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/25
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/05/27
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/27
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/05/28
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Juri Linkov, 2004/05/28
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Ted Zlatanov, 2004/05/29
- Re: next-error-last-buffer, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/30
Re: next-error-last-buffer, Richard Stallman, 2004/05/25