Re: The emacs_backtrace "feature"

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 13:51:08 -0700
> From: Paul Eggert <address@hidden>
> Cc: Juri Linkov <address@hidden>
> 
> On 09/29/2012 01:01 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > I'd suggest a small research
> 
> It'd be nice to do that, but until someone has the time,
> how about if we just bump the handle_fatal_signal
> backtrace number from 10 to 24?  It sounds like that would
> have addressed Juri's problem.

A quick look at several backtraces in the tracker indicates that
something like 40 will cover most cases.