Re: Towards a cleaner build: eieio

[Lars Ingebrigtsen]

Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:

>> (cl-defmethod object-print ((this eieio-default-superclass) &rest strings)
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>   (eieio-object-name this (apply #'concat strings)))
>
> This is just the default definition.  Packages can add their own methods
> to it.

Oh, oh, I see.  I wasn't aware that there were still specialisations to
object-print all over the place, like

(cl-defmethod object-print ((obj semanticdb-abstract-table) &rest strings)
  ...)

What's the path forward here?  I don't think there are any calls to
object-print left in the code base (except from that cl-print-object)...

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no