[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Changes for emacs 28

From: Boruch Baum
Subject: Re: Changes for emacs 28
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2020 05:31:48 -0400
User-agent: NeoMutt/20180716

 On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 00:20:08 +0200, Ergus wrote:

> There will be never an agreement about changing defaults with long
> ...
> So what if:
> ...
> Does this makes sense?

Debian (and possibly other downstream projects) liberally change
defaults and add packages to their default version of emacs, so your
idea might meet a more enthusiastic reception somewhere in some
downstream project that caters more specifically to the user-base to
which your proposal is aimed.

In the case of Debian, that project may have already started moving in
the *opposite* direction; they culled many small debian-specific tweaks,
and removed packages from their 'vanilla' default version of emacs. On
the other hand, they've increased and somewhat standardized native
package-manager support for many third-party packages that most users
get MELPA or other third-parties.

Communicating with people at the following links might help advance your



CA45 09B5 5351 7C11 A9D1  7286 0036 9E45 1595 8BC0

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]