Re: [patch: first impression] (was: log-edit-insert-changelog even when run git/hg from the)

[Dmitry Gutov]

On 10.10.2022 17:53, Uwe Brauer wrote:
> > On 10.10.2022 09:39, Uwe Brauer wrote:
> > Just 'git apply' on top of the latest master.
> I have to wait till the BUG I reported is resolved, since otherwise working 
> with Emacs is an ordeal. However I have given it a try and it seems, that in 
> mercurial speech,
> there is a
>
>   hg up tip
>
> Missing, the @ is not on tip (I think called HEAD in git), but on the changeset 
> (commit) just before.
>
> I have to debug this in order to see what is going on.
>
> The behavior is a bit annoying especially if you continue working and want to 
> commit again, in which case you might create a new head (in mercurial speech), 
> if you are not carefully checking the graph before.
>
> But if you do, your solution is  somehow working.

OK. What if our solution also automatically calls `hg up tip` at the 
end? Should that always work, or would it mess up situations where the 
user actually wanted to be in that state (head not at tip), and was in 
that originally?

E.g. if they wanted to "create a new head" using the new method to 
commit a patch?