[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] facism gaining ground in US
From: |
Pierce T . Wetter III |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] facism gaining ground in US |
Date: |
Sun, 18 Jul 2004 15:55:05 -0700 |
rise in Europe...I hear about beatings of guest workers...I hear
you're
thinking about not letting Turkey in the EU.
Hold on just a minute... not letting Turkey in the EU because of their
government's human rights record is racist??
Those weren't related thoughts. I sort of meant racism against Turkish
people. Some of the anti-Turkey stuff I've read hasn't exactly shown
Europeans as a fountain of equal treatment to all races.
Of course, you could do the same thing in the US, but you've gotten
off the point then, because what I was trying to point out was that
both the US
and many EU countries have some work to do.
(Of course this is a very hypocritical policy to exclude Turkey from
the EU
for human rights reasons, because those same EU countries finance
projects
abroad with dubious human rights records, including in Turkey. Recently
a quantum leap in injustice was proposed in which pretty much all laws,
constitutional protections and human rights standards would not apply
to
people a certain distance from the aforementioned pipeline. I don't
know
if that has gone through.)
I think we're in violent agreement.
Can't tell whether you're an idiot or not. I certainly don't assume
that
you are, but when you go around sending senseless things like:
"The US is a fascist state"
you aren't exactly showing a large capability for reasonable
discussion.
Certainly the US is not fascist internally. However, there are
proto-fascist
*tendencies* on the domestic front (Patriot Act, Patriot Act II,
etc.), and
it acts in fascist ways towards other countries. Hence the wildly
divergent
views about it. I think that both "the US is not fascist" and "the US
is
fascist" can each be understood to be true in a certain sense.
I think that when we repeat rhetoric as fact that we lose the ability
to measure progress. I see far too many people repeating rhetoric they
heard other people say, without realizing they're repeating rhetoric.
Somewhere the real issues get lost, and we lose our ability to have
reasoned discussion on any topic that won't fit in a sound bite.
To me, it seems that most of the largest issues in our society are
issues that are too complex to fit into a sound bite. That's why they
remain issues, because once you need more then 5 seconds to discuss it,
its not something the media can cover effectively.
Ok, we've gone from being a fascist state to "fascist towards the
world".
Yes, exactly.
Especially with regard to the occupation of Iraq. If Seymour Hersch's
allegations are true that young Iraqi boys were imprisoned and raped
with
broom-handles, on camera, with their mothers within earshot... that
sounds
like Nazi behaviour to me.
I wish people would give links...googling...ok,
I guess you mean this:
http://washingtontimes.com/upi-breaking/20040717-082858-3675r.htm
Don't see any reference to broom-handles or mothers.
Here's another reference that links to some video that I don't have
the bandwith to download:
http://www.commondreams.org/news2004/0716-06.htm
Here's some more quotes:
http://bellaciao.org/en/article.php3?id_article=1906
Still no "broom handles".
The difference is one of intent. In our case, those guards were being
prosecuted for doing that. Under Saddam, those guards would have been
promoted. We put our sadists in Jail,
Not always. Firstly, some accusations are simply ignored and do not
appear
to be properly investigated, and secondly, Bush and Rumsfeld
*authorised*
abusive tactics - first in Guatamano, and then in Iraq. Thirdly, the
evidence on the ground suggest that abuse, including torture, was or is
used on a widespread scale as a means of terrorising the prisoners and
getting them to cooperate, not just out of mindless sadism (although
there
was a lot of that, too).
Yeah, all that is a slippery slope. Is leaving the lights on torture?
That's probably a stretch. Is putting a hood over someone's head
torture? Probably not.
Here's the relevant from one of the above links:
"Hersh’s latest information comes on the heels of a newly released 2002
Pentagon memo detailing that Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld
personally authorized the use of controversial prisoner interrogation
tactics, including the use of dogs for intimidation, stripping
prisoners of clothes and hooding them."
Is that torture? Probably not strictly, but its clearly intimidation.
If I was making a firey rhetorical speech for TV I'd call it torture
though...which would then get picked up on the networks as "Pierce says
Rumsfield condoned torture in Iraq" which isn't _quite_ true.
So my take: Rumsfeld authorized some questionable stuff. There are
quite
a few issues where its better to draw the line clearly then it is to try
to adapt that line to every situation. I think "how far you can go" when
interrogating prisoners is one of them. Rumsfeld was trying to draw a
distinction where none really exists...
Terrorising people by the use of violence. That's pretty much the
definition
of terrorism.
I think that Terrorism is Terrorizing _a_ people by the use of
violence is terrorism, but I'm just being nitpicky. You're being
rhetorical. I don't disagree with your point, but we've got so much
rhetoric floating around about the war it makes it hard to tell what's
really going on.
The fact is that everything you do has good and bad aspects. If you
concentrate on only the bad aspects, you can't do anything, because
everything you do will be questioned. If you concentrate on only the
good
aspects, you give people more slack then they probably should have.
I have no idea where to draw the line, but rhetoric rarely helps.
If we were never going to do anything where the guards might abuse
prisoners, we'd have to shutdown the entire criminal justice system.
Its not just the guards of course:
http://talkleft.com/new_archives/005846.html#005846
I have a friend who nearly got raped in jail, she was there because of
a parking ticket...perhaps ALL prisons need reform.
Pierce
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] facism gaining ground in US, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] facism gaining ground in US, Matthew Dempsky, 2004/07/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] facism gaining ground in US, Harald Meland, 2004/07/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] facism gaining ground in US, Matthew Dempsky, 2004/07/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] facism gaining ground in US, Pierce T . Wetter III, 2004/07/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] facism gaining ground in US, Matthew Dempsky, 2004/07/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] facism gaining ground in US, nadim, 2004/07/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] facism gaining ground in US, Pierce T . Wetter III, 2004/07/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] facism gaining ground in US, nadim, 2004/07/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] facism gaining ground in US, Pierce T . Wetter III, 2004/07/18
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] facism gaining ground in US, Robin Green, 2004/07/18
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] facism gaining ground in US,
Pierce T . Wetter III <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] facism gaining ground in US, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2004/07/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] facism gaining ground in US, Robin Green, 2004/07/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] facism gaining ground in US, Pierce T . Wetter III, 2004/07/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] facism gaining ground in US, nadim, 2004/07/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] facism gaining ground in US, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2004/07/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] facism gaining ground in US, Momchil Velikov, 2004/07/21
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [OT] facism gaining ground in US, Miles Bader, 2004/07/21
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [OT] facism gaining ground in US, Momchil Velikov, 2004/07/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [OT] facism gaining ground in US, Samium Gromoff, 2004/07/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] facism gaining ground in US, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2004/07/22