gnu-arch-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Gnu-arch-users] Re: Round II -- new language, arch, furth, etc.


From: Miles Bader
Subject: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Round II -- new language, arch, furth, etc.
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 12:26:39 +0900

Colin Walters <address@hidden> writes:
>> Why do you think people won't be using "tla submit"?
>
> In its current form it is way too limited.  When people submit Rhythmbox
> patches, they often want to describe the patch.  How is that going to
> work?  Would tla become a MUA?  What if they also want to attach a
> backtrace from a core file?  What if they want to GPG-sign the message?
> What if we have an existing infrastructure like Bugzilla for handling
> these kinds of things?  For a larger project, how would they choose the
> "component" a bug report corresponds to?  What about authentication?

Gee, those all sound like good things for an extension language to do
... :-)

-Miles
-- 
97% of everything is grunge




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]