Re: [Gnu-arch-users] changes: tree shows no revisions in version ?

[Andrei A. Voropaev]

On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 10:34:35PM +0800, Cameron Patrick wrote:
> Andrei A. Voropaev wrote:
> 
> > ++default-version. Can it be the source of the problem? If yes, then can
> > I simply change ++default-version to the value preceding patch-log?
> 
> You can.  I'm curious as to how it came to be messed up in the first
> place, though, as it may cause problems for you later on (e.g. if you
> try to commit).  My guess is that you registered an archive with a
> non-canonical name (i.e. your archive is address@hidden but you registered it
> as address@hidden) and then used the address@hidden archive to get from?  If 
> this is
> the case, you should un-register the address@hidden archive (tla
> register-archive -d) and register it again with the correct archive
> name.

That's also interesting for me. This is not my tree, but one of
my collegue. And I have one suspicion. When I do 'tla archives' under
his name I get both address@hidden and address@hidden pointing to the same 
archive.
Since both of us are learning, he might have registered the same archive
under 2 different names and then checked out his copy under false name.

Andrei