Re: [Gnu-arch-users] changes: tree shows no revisions in version ?

[Andrei A. Voropaev]

On Fri, Dec 10, 2004 at 05:19:33PM +1100, address@hidden wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 09, 2004 at 10:23:36AM -0600, Gustavo C??rdova Avila wrote:
> > Andrei A. Voropaev wrote:
> > 
> > >Well. It took me quite a few tries before I've figured this out. If
> > >assigning different name to archive is so dangerous, then why is it
> > >allowed? And if it is allowed, then why later usage of alternative name
> > >leads to problems?
> > >
> > >Andrei
> > >
> > Well, for one thing, you might know just what you're doing,
> 
> ..
> 
> 
> the problem is not that you can or cannot do it, the problem
> seems to be that some arch tutorial out there has this as an
> example.
> 
> irc was full of people having these problems a little while back
> but sorry, i can't remember the where the problematical tutorial was.

Did I understand it correctly that the section
http://regexps.srparish.net/www/tutorial/html/shared-and-public-archives.html
should be changed so that tla register-archive does not specify explicit
name?

Andrei