[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FW: Professional ???
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
Re: FW: Professional ??? |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Dec 2000 00:55:01 +0100 |
address@hidden writes:
> Maybe you misunderstand me. I just don't want to see any suggestions
> or advocacy for, or discussions about, non-free softwares packages
> that may fill a particular practical need. This is not the place, you
> should take that to another forum, eg, rec.music.compose.
Oww, come on, don't be so tight-assed. If people want to discuss the
relative merits of different packages among us "in-crowd", they have
my sincere blessing. When the discussion gets too much off-topic, we
can always switch to private mail.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys | address@hidden | http://www.cs.uu.nl/~hanwen/
- Re: FW: Professional ???, (continued)
- Re: FW: Professional ???, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2000/12/13
- Re: FW: Professional ???, Christian Mondrup, 2000/12/13
- Re: FW: Professional ???, Juergen Reuter, 2000/12/13
- Re: FW: Professional ???, David Raleigh Arnold, 2000/12/14
- Vector touchup, Jeff Henrikson, 2000/12/15
- Re: Vector touchup, Christian Mondrup, 2000/12/15
- Vector touchup, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2000/12/15
- Re: Vector touchup, David Raleigh Arnold, 2000/12/15
- Re: Vector touchup, François Pinard, 2000/12/15
- Re: FW: Professional ???, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2000/12/13
- Re: FW: Professional ???,
Han-Wen Nienhuys <=
- Re: FW: Professional ???, Peter Schaffter, 2000/12/14
- Re: FW: Professional ???, Mats Bengtsson, 2000/12/13
- Converters (was: Re: FW: Professional ???), Laura Conrad, 2000/12/13
- Re: Converters (was: Re: FW: Professional ???), Laurent Martelli, 2000/12/13
Re: FW: Professional ???, Mats Bengtsson, 2000/12/13
FW: Professional ???, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2000/12/17