Re: Debian patch for LilyPond 1.3.119

[Jan Nieuwenhuizen]

Anthony Fok <address@hidden> writes:

> ... Oh, I see!  I was scratching my head about those additions in
> debian/rules because "dh_installchangelogs -k" never gave me any problem,

> Compare the two and see the difference:
> 
>       lilypond1.3 (1.3.119-1) unstable; urgency=low
>       lilypond1.3 (1.3.107) unstable; urgency=low
> 
> Yes, the difference is "-1".

Ah, ok.  Wow, do you have some pointers to debian maintainer documents
that I could read, that would tell me this kind of stuff?  Seems this
was a small puzzle for you too?

> For some reasons, the --force wasn't there during the build

Thanks, I'll look into this.  The info building is rather complex, in
lilypond.  We don't want to generate examples if we don't have to,
etc.

> Especially, please check out #79064 and #79066 filed by Daniel Burrows.
> How to solve them?  I don't have a clue, at least not yet.  :-)

Ok, I'll have a look.  Thanks for all the info.  I'm running unstable,
of course, esp. for powerpc there's not really a choice.

Greetings,
Jan.

-- 
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien       | http://www.lilypond.org