|
| From: | Werner LEMBERG |
| Subject: | Re: shorthand for autoBeam control |
| Date: | Sun, 07 Sep 2008 08:21:26 +0200 (CEST) |
> > My special example is this where such a shorthand would be quite
> > convenient:
> >
> > c4 c c \times 2/3 { r8 c16 } c8
>
> This may have nothing to do with your proposal/question but as a
> reader I would find your example much harder to read/sightread than
>
> c4 c c \times 2/3 { r8[ c16] } c8
> or
> c4 c c \times 2/3 { r8[ c16 } c8]
Yes. What I really would like to write is
c4 c c \times 2/3 { r8 c16[] } c8
and I just demonstrated a case where my proposed notation would be
helpful.
Werner
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |