lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]

## Re: shorthand for autoBeam control

 From: Paul Scott Subject: Re: shorthand for autoBeam control Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2008 02:36:31 -0700 User-agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080724)

Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>>> My special example is this where such a shorthand would be quite
>>> convenient:
>>>
>>>   c4 c c \times 2/3 { r8 c16 } c8
>>>
>> This may have nothing to do with your proposal/question but as a
>>
>>     c4 c c \times 2/3 { r8[ c16] } c8
>> or
>>     c4 c c \times 2/3 { r8[ c16 } c8]
>>
>
> Yes.  What I really would like to write is
>
>   c4 c c \times 2/3 { r8 c16[] } c8
>
> and I just demonstrated a case where my proposed notation would be
>
My point is that is it not helpful in this case because it produces a
notation which is IMO harder to read than the two variations that I
gave.  Maybe you can give an example where \noBeam makes something