lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]

## Re: shorthand for autoBeam control

 From: Werner LEMBERG Subject: Re: shorthand for autoBeam control Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2008 13:15:22 +0200 (CEST)

> > Yes.  What I really would like to write is
> >
> >   c4 c c \times 2/3 { r8 c16[] } c8
> >
> > and I just demonstrated a case where my proposed notation would be

> My point is that is it not helpful in this case because it produces
> a notation which is IMO harder to read than the two variations that
> I gave.  Maybe you can give an example where \noBeam makes something

First of all, I'm quite conservative and I really dislike such
beamlets.  Additionally, all music before, say, 1930, doesn't use
beamlets at all, so you need a means to produce flagged notes.

Werner