lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]

## Re: shorthand for autoBeam control

 From: Han-Wen Nienhuys Subject: Re: shorthand for autoBeam control Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2008 11:39:49 -0300

On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 3:21 AM, Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> wrote:
>> This may have nothing to do with your proposal/question but as a
>>
>>     c4 c c \times 2/3 { r8[ c16] } c8
>> or
>>     c4 c c \times 2/3 { r8[ c16 } c8]
>
> Yes.  What I really would like to write is
>
>  c4 c c \times 2/3 { r8 c16[] } c8
>
> and I just demonstrated a case where my proposed notation would be

Can we stop the discussion on syntax extensions?  \noBeam does the job
perfectly, and it is rare enough case that it does not warrant extra
shorthands.

--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen



reply via email to