[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nel] NeL Network Engine
From: |
Ian Holsman |
Subject: |
Re: [Nel] NeL Network Engine |
Date: |
Mon, 26 Feb 2001 12:54:15 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; 0.9) Gecko/20010226 |
On 26 Feb 2001, you wrote in games.nevrax:
>Bernard Hugueney wrote:
>
>I guess we're raising the question of time sharing (or 'multiplexing',
>sounds cool :)). You can let the OS do it for you and use threads
>everywhere : BeOS is a good example since everything than can receive
>events is in a thread. You can do it all by yourself : use one process
>and dispatch the incoming events to functions (ie. WinProc). Why you
>would use one more than the other is a matter of design, and also
>depends on the type of application and the OS you use. The anwser is
>really not simple and won't certainly fit in a mail, but I must admit I
>don't have good pointers to give ...
for discussions on different threading models you really should be
looking at, and drill down to the documents/technical papers.
you probably don't want to maintain a thread per connected user, but
have some kind of 'state' information which can be refered to by the
incoming request.
http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ACE.html
..Ian
- Re: [Nel] NeL Network Engine, (continued)
- Re: [Nel] NeL Network Engine, Vianney Lecroart, 2001/02/28
- Re: [Nel] NeL Network Engine, Vincent Caron, 2001/02/28
- Re: [Nel] NeL Network Engine, Nicolas Hognon, 2001/02/28
- Re: [Nel] NeL Network Engine, Zane, 2001/02/28
- Re: [Nel] NeL Network Engine, Nicolas Hognon, 2001/02/28
- Re: [Nel] NeL Network Engine, elijah wright, 2001/02/28
- Re: [Nel] NeL Network Engine, Zane, 2001/02/28
- Re: [Nel] NeL Network Engine, Bernard Hugueney, 2001/02/28
- Re: [Nel] NeL Network Engine, Leighton Haynes, 2001/02/28
Re: [Nel] NeL Network Engine, Nicolas Hognon, 2001/02/22
Re: [Nel] NeL Network Engine,
Ian Holsman <=