[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Update CoC adapted from upstream 2.1 (instead of 1.4)
From: |
Thorsten Wilms |
Subject: |
Re: Update CoC adapted from upstream 2.1 (instead of 1.4) |
Date: |
Sat, 26 Feb 2022 10:08:56 +0100 |
On Sat, 26 Feb 2022 01:48:22 +0100
Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@gmail.com> wrote:
> As a nice side-effect, adding it would give us
> two reasons to ban Taylan; first for discriminating against trans
> people based on their sex characteristics and second based on their
> gender identity or expression.
This is very twisted and unfair to Taylan.
Are you saying that even just implying that a trans-woman is not the
same as a cis-woman (or the same for man) is discrimination (strictly
in the negative sense of the word)?
--
Thorsten Wilms <t_w_@freenet.de>
- Re: Update CoC adapted from upstream 2.1 (instead of 1.4), (continued)
- Re: Update CoC adapted from upstream 2.1 (instead of 1.4), Taylan Kammer, 2022/02/25
- Apology and proposal withdraw, zimoun, 2022/02/25
- Re: Update CoC adapted from upstream 2.1 (instead of 1.4), Liliana Marie Prikler, 2022/02/25
- Re: Update CoC adapted from upstream 2.1 (instead of 1.4), Blake Shaw, 2022/02/25
- Re: Update CoC adapted from upstream 2.1 (instead of 1.4), Blake Shaw, 2022/02/25