Re: What kinds of bindings are to be included

[Andreas Rottmann]

Andy Wingo <address@hidden> writes:

>> I think that over time we might aggregate bindings of more and more of
>> the GNOME APIs, which will probably make a global ChangeLog a bit
>> unwieldly..
>
> What should go into /usr/share/doc/guile-gnome on Debian, then? Just a
> thought... I would rather go for the hypothetical anti-tool, that takes
> a global ChangeLog and tells you the logs for only one directory ;)
>
We'll propably just have a guile-gnome metapackage, with actual
packages named like guile-gtk, guile-gda, guile-glade, etc... 

However, I'm not really opposed to a global ChangeLog. I think we
should wait 'till we get our trees synced up, though. On this matter,
I'll try to review my local changes of guile-gobject and commit them
to my arch branch. These changes mostly depend on the g-wrap that is
currently in my archive
(address@hidden/g-wrap--rotty--0.2). I don't quite know
how we should proceed once I've commited my g-gobject changes to my
branch. Should I wait with committing my changes to CVS until Rob to
integrate my changes into g-wrap CVS? I can't guess how long he will
need for that...

Regards, Andy
-- 
Andreas Rottmann         | address@hidden      | address@hidden | address@hidden
http://www.8ung.at/rotty | GnuPG Key: http://www.8ung.at/rotty/gpg.asc
Fingerprint              | DFB4 4EB4 78A4 5EEE 6219  F228 F92F CFC5 01FD 5B62

It's *GNU*/Linux dammit!