[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: elementary OS
From: |
Markus Hitter |
Subject: |
Re: elementary OS |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Feb 2014 21:14:22 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 |
Am 10.02.2014 17:55, schrieb Thom Cherryhomes:
> Those of you crying for more integration, a cohesive environment to work
> on, a deficiency to be dealt with:
>
> Why don't you actually roll up your sleeves, and try to build it?
Already done. Each try to improve things results in a No. According to
their developers, GNUstep is in a nearly perfect shape. Complications
are expected and a such, fine. The bundle-type and installation domain
approaches fit almost no existing Linux of BSD distribution, still even
discussing them is sort of blasphemy.
Markus
--
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dipl. Ing. (FH) Markus Hitter
http://www.jump-ing.de/
- Re: elementary OS, (continued)
- Re: elementary OS, Gregory Casamento, 2014/02/09
- Re: elementary OS, Gregory Casamento, 2014/02/09
- Re: elementary OS, Liam Proven, 2014/02/10
- Re: elementary OS, Patryk Laurent, 2014/02/10
- Re: elementary OS, Thom Cherryhomes, 2014/02/10
- Re: elementary OS, Liam Proven, 2014/02/10
- Re: elementary OS, Thom Cherryhomes, 2014/02/10
- Re: elementary OS, Ivan Vučica, 2014/02/10
- Re: elementary OS, Riccardo Mottola, 2014/02/10
- Re: elementary OS,
Markus Hitter <=
- Re: elementary OS, Thom Cherryhomes, 2014/02/10
- Re: elementary OS, Michael P. Soulier, 2014/02/10
- Re: elementary OS, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller, 2014/02/10
- Re: elementary OS, Michael P. Soulier, 2014/02/10
- Re: elementary OS, Riccardo Mottola, 2014/02/10
- Re: elementary OS, Michael P. Soulier, 2014/02/10
- Re: elementary OS, Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller, 2014/02/10
- Re: elementary OS, Gerold Rupprecht, 2014/02/11
- Re: elementary OS, Gregory Casamento, 2014/02/11
- RE: elementary OS, a b, 2014/02/10