[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Grammar checking
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Grammar checking |
Date: |
Sat, 01 Apr 2023 23:11:42 -0400 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> > I am using it in real-life scenarios for authoring.
> > LanguageTool the most sophisticated Libre grammar checker around, AFAIK.
> That's not enough, IMO. It should be good in absolute terms, not in
> relative terms.
At a minimum, it needs to be good enough to be useful, and thus worth
the effort to merge and maintain it. (Otherwise, ignoring it would be
a better option.) If it is better than that, that is a bonus.
--
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
- Re: Grammar checking, (continued)
- Re: Grammar checking, Philip Kaludercic, 2023/04/09
- Re: Grammar checking, Lynn Winebarger, 2023/04/09
- Re: Grammar checking, Richard Stallman, 2023/04/21
- Re: Grammar checking, Richard Stallman, 2023/04/22
- Re: Grammar checking, Lynn Winebarger, 2023/04/23
Re: Grammar checking, Richard Stallman, 2023/04/01
Re: Grammar checking,
Richard Stallman <=
Re: grammar checking, Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez, 2023/04/03