[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Grammar checking
From: |
Philip Kaludercic |
Subject: |
Re: Grammar checking |
Date: |
Sun, 09 Apr 2023 09:02:14 +0000 |
Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> writes:
> > But, would it be
> > acceptable for a GNU software project to depend on such software?
>
> If we have free software to do further training on the neural network,
> we can accept it.
>
> Does LanguageTool use a neural network?
No, according to [0] as of 2010 the approach they were using was
rule-based, as opposed to statistical (neutral network).
[0]
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Marcin-Milkowski/publication/220282022_Developing_an_open-source_rule-based_proofreading_tool/links/5b030f720f7e9be94bdabb60/Developing-an-open-source-rule-based-proofreading-tool.pdf
--
Philip Kaludercic
- Re: Grammar checking, (continued)
- Re: Grammar checking, Richard Stallman, 2023/04/02
- Re: Grammar checking, Lynn Winebarger, 2023/04/06
- Re: Grammar checking, Richard Stallman, 2023/04/07
- Re: Grammar checking, Lynn Winebarger, 2023/04/08
- Re: Grammar checking, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/04/08
- Re: Grammar checking, Richard Stallman, 2023/04/07
- Re: Grammar checking, Lynn Winebarger, 2023/04/08
- Re: Grammar checking, Richard Stallman, 2023/04/07
- Re: Grammar checking, Lynn Winebarger, 2023/04/08
- Re: Grammar checking, Richard Stallman, 2023/04/19
- Re: Grammar checking,
Philip Kaludercic <=
- Re: Grammar checking, Lynn Winebarger, 2023/04/09
- Re: Grammar checking, Richard Stallman, 2023/04/21
- Re: Grammar checking, Richard Stallman, 2023/04/22
- Re: Grammar checking, Lynn Winebarger, 2023/04/23
Re: Grammar checking, Richard Stallman, 2023/04/01
Re: Grammar checking, Richard Stallman, 2023/04/01
Re: grammar checking, Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez, 2023/04/03