[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: jinx
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: jinx |
Date: |
Mon, 03 Apr 2023 22:56:54 -0400 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> `flyspell-prog-mode' doesn't have any relation to prog-mode. It is
> a function (not really a mode) that enables flyspell-mode and sets
> the buffer-local variable `flyspell-generic-check-word-predicate'.
It seems to act somewhat like a major mode but not entirely.
Also, its name seems to suggest something different. That can
cause confusion.
Is it possible to rename this to a clearer name? Perhaps
program-text-flyspell-mode, or something else? And then make it a
proper major mode?, following all the conventions for major modes?
--
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
- Re: jinx, (continued)
- Re: jinx, Arash Esbati, 2023/04/01
- Re: jinx, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/04/01
- Re: jinx, Arash Esbati, 2023/04/01
- Re: jinx, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/04/01
- Re: jinx, Arash Esbati, 2023/04/02
- Re: jinx, Michael Heerdegen, 2023/04/03
- Re: jinx, Michael Eliachevitch, 2023/04/03
- Re: jinx, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/04/03
- Re: jinx, Michael Eliachevitch, 2023/04/03
- Re: jinx,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: jinx, Michael Heerdegen, 2023/04/04
- Re: jinx, Richard Stallman, 2023/04/04
- Re: jinx, Philip Kaludercic, 2023/04/05
- Re: jinx, Michael Heerdegen, 2023/04/05
- Re: jinx, Michael Heerdegen, 2023/04/05
- Re: jinx, Eli Zaretskii, 2023/04/05
- Re: jinx, Michael Heerdegen, 2023/04/05
- Re: jinx, Richard Stallman, 2023/04/04
- Re: jinx, Po Lu, 2023/04/05
- Re: jinx, Arash Esbati, 2023/04/05