[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: jinx

From: Michael Heerdegen
Subject: Re: jinx
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2023 14:32:36 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

> > From: Arash Esbati <arash@gnu.org>
> > Cc: rms@gnu.org,  m.eliachevitch@posteo.de,  emacs-devel@gnu.org
> > Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2023 09:42:40 +0200
> >
> > Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> >
> > > I'm not sure I understand item c), though: when and why would one want
> > > to spell-check macros and environments?
> >
> > Sorry, I meant to say arguments/bodies of macros/environments, not the
> > name of macros and environments.
> This is again not TeX-specific.  Similar issues exist in Texinfo and
> in other markup languages.  The annoyance is usually minor: it's
> enough to tell the speller to "accept" a word just once, since the
> number of markup codes is usually very small.  But it would be nicer,
> of course, if Emacs could automatically skip markup in each major
> mode.

Wasn't that the purpose of `flyspell-prog-mode'?


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]