Re: [GNU ELPA] eglot-x.el: Protocol extensions for Eglot

[João Távora]

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

> I understand and agree in general, but surely each change should be
> judged by itself, and some, maybe many, might not have these
> problematic aspects?

Right.  Each change can be judged by itself.

>> A guiding principle of eglot.el (and indede LSP) is to not have any
>> server-specific code.
>
> If "server-specific" behavior is, for example, just some non-standard
> capabilities, that doesn't count as "server-specific code" in my book.
> After all, a standard-compliant server could very well implement only
> a subset of the capabilities documented by the standard.

Right, again.  Each change should be judged on its own merits.

> But it should not use advice, IMNSHO.

Agree.