[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove
From: |
Alan Mackenzie |
Subject: |
Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Jun 2024 15:14:53 +0000 |
Hello, Stefan.
On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 10:27:44 -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > That doesn't clear up all that much. The answers to "why?" are
> > missing.
> To provide keybindings to the windmove commands by default,
> i.e. without any configuration on the part of the user.
What's so special about windmove that it deserves such privileged
treatment? windmove is already useable with trivial configuration.
I could argue that there are more important features needing key
bindings. For example, more easily selecting specific frames, or setting
up a frame to use Follow Mode more easily. Heck, even other-window
really needs a single stroke key binding.
I would expect you to argue back that these features are just my own
personal preferences, and I would accept that. I am arguing the same
back to you and Daniel - you want to install your personal preferences in
the default key maps.
Neither you nor Daniel has yet given any strong argument why this
particular package is so special.
> Stefan
--
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, (continued)
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Daniel Colascione, 2024/06/26
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Po Lu, 2024/06/26
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Alan Mackenzie, 2024/06/26
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Colin Baxter, 2024/06/26
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/06/26
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Joel Reicher, 2024/06/26
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/06/26
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Alan Mackenzie, 2024/06/26
- RE: [External] : Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Drew Adams, 2024/06/26
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Stefan Monnier, 2024/06/26
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove,
Alan Mackenzie <=
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Po Lu, 2024/06/26
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Daniel Colascione, 2024/06/26
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Po Lu, 2024/06/26
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Stefan Monnier, 2024/06/26
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Po Lu, 2024/06/26
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Alan Mackenzie, 2024/06/26
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Augusto Stoffel, 2024/06/27
- RE: [External] : Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Drew Adams, 2024/06/26
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Daniel Colascione, 2024/06/23
- Re: Proposal: new default bindings for winner and windmove, Po Lu, 2024/06/23