[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Announce: library-relink
From: |
Aaron Bentley |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Announce: library-relink |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Apr 2005 08:08:13 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Debian Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050116) |
John A Meinel wrote:
Your archive as of patch-24 is corrupted.
If I do:
baz register-archive
http://push.sourcecontrol.net/archives/address@hidden/
baz get address@hidden/library-relink--devel library-relink
Patch-24 seems to be an add of the entire file, where the old version
was empty.
Yes, I know about that.
Did your library-relink code actually corrupt your revlib?
Yes. g.a.u seems to be down, but I've discussed this with Robin Farine,
and hopefully you'll see those mails when the list comes back.
What seems to have happened is that I did a library add in the middle of
relinking. This caused an inode number to be used that the script had
already associated with another file.
The bug is fixed in
address@hidden/library-relink--devel--1--patch-5
Basically, I went from using (st_dev and st_ino) as identity, to using
(st_dev, st_ino, st_mtime, st_size, st_mode). It's virtually impossible
to trick it now.
Say you
stopped it mid-way through
If you ^C in the middle, it will finish writing the inode sig, then
exit. Even if it stopped abruptly, tla/baz would detect it as a corrupt
revision.
so it would not finish relinking a file, or
some such thing.
If it's interrupted in the middle of relinking, you'll just get a
harmless temporary file in that revision.
Or maybe something else was accessing the file while
you tried to change the link.
Well, readonly access is fine. Write access is totally against the rules.
The best thing (I think) is to tag devel--0 into devel--1 and cachrev
the new base-0.
I've already tagged the last good revision into devel--1, and applied
the latest changes to it. So no need to cacherev.
However, people who already have patch-23 or less, will
probably prefer to try to build through patch-24. But this can be
avoided by removing the pristine and doing another get.
Since I tagged from the last good revision, this isn't a problem.
Aaron
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Announce: library-relink, John A Meinel, 2005/04/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Announce: library-relink,
Aaron Bentley <=