gnucobol-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [open-cobol-list] What do you think of JCL ?


From: Patrick
Subject: Re: [open-cobol-list] What do you think of JCL ?
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 12:24:54 -0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130809 Thunderbird/17.0.8

Thanks for the feedback everyone

If JCL is designed to solve problems we don't have on the desktop, then let me reverse that question.

Would a Guile, Tcl, lua Open Cobol binding solve problems on the mainframes normally tackled by JCL and provide an alternative to JCL?







On 09/19/2013 12:06 PM, Brian Tiffin wrote:
Patrick; Michael;

Take a look at Fossil SCM by Richard Hipp.  A subset of Tcl (TH1) is
built into the bug tracking feature and for top and bottom banner
control of the CGI interface.  Pretty cool.

Oh, I'l ditto Vince as well.  Go with shell and cron and skip JCL on
the GNU/Linux side.  Or for playing with JCL, (a thing to know, even
if it's just "yeah I've seen JCL"), take a look at
http://my.opera.com/btiffin/blog/2012/02/27/hercules-os-360-mvt-and-cobol-circa-1972
for instructions on a Hercules MVT setup that you can play with.

Cheers,
Brian

On 9/19/13, Patrick <address@hidden> wrote:
Hi Mike

"I like your enthusiasm, never loose that!"

I won't ! , I promise.

I love Tcl. Basically my favourites are Cobol, Tcl and Ada.

Have you looked at jim tcl ?

It's really small.

This is probably just some more "crack smokin" but I have been day
dreaming about rewriting jim in pure COBOL. Tcl in native cobol would be
neat.

I have printed all of the source of jim in color and I am also studying
tcl parsers written in tcl to lower the bar to entry.

Thanks





On 09/19/2013 10:53 AM, Michael Anderson wrote:
Patrick,

Although I agree with Vince, I like your enthusiasm, never loose that!

As of lately (the last 5 years), I've been doing migration work,
migrating HP3000 applications to Windows, Linux and HPUX (Unix). Like
IBM, HP, specifically the HP3000 has it's own version of JCL.

Many of the programmers I work with jump right into converting the JCL
to some local scripting language. On windows it would be BAT files or
Power-hell, on Linux its bash scripts, on HPUX its ksh scripts, and so
on......

Much of the JCL originated from batch the processing days, then the
OLTP machines made it more interactive, and on HP MPE/iX platforms it
grew into a very advanced scripting language. So, for me (to emulate
the JCL environment) the replacement for Batch/JCL is Tcl. For a
minute I thought about using NodeJS instead of Tcl. In the end I
choose Tcl, mostly because I can call "TclEval" directly from Cobol, or
C.

Converting all JCL to Tcl makes more sense, because the exact same Tcl
syntax can be used on any of the most popular platforms, including
Windows, Mac, and all flavours of Unix.

Now with GNU being my platform of choice, and becoming more aligned
with the Richard Stallman philosophy, I ponder, should I trade Tcl,
for Guile?

--
Mike.



On 09/19/2013 08:13 AM, Chris Geldenhuis wrote:
On 09/19/2013 02:17 PM, Vincent Coen wrote:
On Wednesday 18 Sep 2013 22:03:06 Patrick wrote:

After reading one today, it sounds like people invented the scripting
language I was considering long ago, job control language.
This sounds like it should be the easiest language to implement, is
it
really inconsistent and weird? How could something so simple have
gone
wrong.
Would JCL or something like it be good for open Cobol ?
JCL is exactly that a Job control system for executing/starting jobs
on a m/f (mainframe) it links any resources needed by a specific
program or group of programs, e.g., files and their access type,
printers etc.

Yes, some of the commands in it are inconsistent but that is more
the fact that various programmers have coded the new stuff without
sticking to some standards in format etc.

Under Linux such a process is NOT required as it is all dealt with
inside the existing tools of Linux.

There is no need for it and more importantly the old saying

"If it is not broken don't fix it"

comes seriously to mind.

It is a wasted exercise.

Vince

+1

ChrisG

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LIMITED TIME SALE - Full Year of Microsoft Training For Just $49.99!
1,500+ hours of tutorials including VisualStudio 2012, Windows 8,
SharePoint
2013, SQL 2012, MVC 4, more. BEST VALUE: New Multi-Library Power Pack
includes
Mobile, Cloud, Java, and UX Design. Lowest price ever! Ends 9/20/13.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58041151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk


_______________________________________________
open-cobol-list mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open-cobol-list


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LIMITED TIME SALE - Full Year of Microsoft Training For Just $49.99!
1,500+ hours of tutorials including VisualStudio 2012, Windows 8,
SharePoint
2013, SQL 2012, MVC 4, more. BEST VALUE: New Multi-Library Power Pack
includes
Mobile, Cloud, Java, and UX Design. Lowest price ever! Ends 9/20/13.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58041151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk


_______________________________________________
open-cobol-list mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open-cobol-list


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LIMITED TIME SALE - Full Year of Microsoft Training For Just $49.99!
1,500+ hours of tutorials including VisualStudio 2012, Windows 8,
SharePoint
2013, SQL 2012, MVC 4, more. BEST VALUE: New Multi-Library Power Pack
includes
Mobile, Cloud, Java, and UX Design. Lowest price ever! Ends 9/20/13.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58041151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk


_______________________________________________
open-cobol-list mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open-cobol-list




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]