Re: [netPanzer-Devel] Plans

[Matze Braun]

On Sun, 31 Aug 2003, Stephane Marchesin wrote:

> Matze Braun wrote:
> 
> >
> >On Sat, 30 Aug 2003, Ingo Ruhnke wrote:
> >
> >>Matze Braun <address@hidden> writes:
> >>
> >>>-Infrastructure/Cvs:
> >>>Yes, cvs write acces would be nice for some people :)
> >>>
> >>I have now setup a netpanzer-cvs list to which all commits will be
> >>automatically mailed, should make keeping track of changes a bit
> >>easier. Subscription details are at:
> >>
> >>http://savannah.nongnu.org/mail/?group=netpanzer
> >>
> >>Those people that want CVS access, please create a savannah account
> >>and mail me your login names.
> >>
> >Fine, I assume you should also create a tag/branch for the original 
> >source (before we start hacking all the code).
> >
> CVS automatically tags the first import, so it's not lost :)
> 
> >
> >Would be nice if you could gimme write access to cvs my username on 
> >savannah is MatzeBraun
> >
> I'm intersted in CVS access too, I've some changes lying here. My 
> savannah account is http://savannah.gnu.org/users/blackknight
> 
> Btw, I also have some asm knowledge so I can rewrite things like 
> rdtsc... (looking at the code, it seems that SDL_GetTicks() isn't 
> accurate enough but it could be used as a fallback for portability...).
I think we should avoid all assembly. This stuff is always a portability 
problem. I can't see any reason why millisecond accuracy isn't be 
enough...
I think we should analyze all the assembler routines and substitute them 
with C++ code or SDL calls.

Greetings,
        Matze