Re: [Human-beings-discuss] trying to move on

[dams]

Guillaume Cottenceau <address@hidden> writes:

> dams <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > That's why I asked. I think writing the rules can be distributed at some 
> > level.
> > For example, discuss of each unit, and its properties, then freeze them, 
> > then
> > go to the next one, in a very precise manner, so that we have the exhaustive
> > set of units. After that, building the rule will be easier, even if it will
> > force some units/properties to be modified
> 
> I'm not sure. This is not a very interesting part, and the coding
> part right after is the most long/important part (and the rules
> can always be changed later on - I hope most of them will not be
> hardcoded in the code, moreover!), so I need to begin it a.s.a.p
> if I want this project to have a 0.001% chance of completion.
> 
> Also, trolling for days on each unit is not very interesting nor
> productive :).

ok :)