[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Human-beings-discuss] trying to move on
From: |
Guillaume Cottenceau |
Subject: |
Re: [Human-beings-discuss] trying to move on |
Date: |
09 Oct 2002 17:33:13 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
dams <address@hidden> writes:
[...]
> > Maybe, being able to reuse only annex cities would be a solution.
>
> oh yes I forgot, of course, in my vision, because you have a capital city,
> either
> you reused enemy annex cities, or you win, because you destroyed the capital
> city. And we forbid reuse of batiments in the enemy capital city
Yep, this could be a good in-between solution.
[...]
> agreed. All this fuel mess is possible _only_ if the thing is fully automated,
> the player can only decide to build more fuel truck/similar units, flag
> certain
> units so that the refuelling system ignore them (if you want to do a suicide
> recognition), and maybe choose the refuelling stle for the whole units, or one
hum, not useful IMHO. the refueling will be automatic when a
refuel unit is "nearby" the attacking units. so this will be done
automatically.
> in particular (advanced settings), like "refuell automatically", warn when a
> group of unit needs refuelling, and the user click on a button to let the unit
> being refueled automatically.
hum, i don't agree. fully automatic is the choice IMHO.
so a unit without a refueler nearby, when the whole fuel is
finished, will simply be unable to move, until a refueler comes
nearby. hum, i like the idea ;p.
> I played homeworld, a space opera, with a BIG mother ship, and little
> fighters/other units. The system is really what I describe. The story is a
i've had this game but it crashed on my machine :-((. the music
of the demo version was absolutely wonderful - i bought the CD of
this music!! the music i loves is Agnus Dei by Barber (it's plain
classical music, in case anyone wonders).
--
Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
- Re: [Human-beings-discuss] trying to move on, (continued)
Re: [Human-beings-discuss] trying to move on, Sébastien Ducoulombier, 2002/10/09
Re: [Human-beings-discuss] trying to move on, dams, 2002/10/09
Re: [Human-beings-discuss] trying to move on, Régis Guinvarc'h, 2002/10/09
Re: [Human-beings-discuss] trying to move on, dams, 2002/10/09
Re: [Human-beings-discuss] trying to move on, Régis Guinvarc'h, 2002/10/09
Re: [Human-beings-discuss] trying to move on, dams, 2002/10/09
Re: [Human-beings-discuss] trying to move on, Régis Guinvarc'h, 2002/10/09
Re: [Human-beings-discuss] trying to move on, dams, 2002/10/09
Re: [Human-beings-discuss] trying to move on, Guillaume Cottenceau, 2002/10/09
Re: [Human-beings-discuss] trying to move on, dams, 2002/10/09
Re: [Human-beings-discuss] trying to move on, Sébastien Ducoulombier, 2002/10/09