[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nel] NeL Network Engine
From: |
Thierry Mallard |
Subject: |
Re: [Nel] NeL Network Engine |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Feb 2001 08:31:06 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.15i |
On Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 05:49:39PM +0100, Bernard Hugueney wrote:
> [ Linux and threads ]
> Well, I'm as far as possible from a threads expert, but I think that
> what makes LinuxThreads special is that they are system threads (vs user
> threads) maybe heavier, but making use of SMP, so basically, I think
> the max nb of threads is very much system dependand (SMP?).
In Linux 2.4.x, you may configure the maximum threads with
/proc/sys/kernel/threads-max, if i remember correctly.
But the default value (4096) is still much more that what the default kernel
can really handle nicely, as is it said in some other posts. We'll have to
look deeper into this...
Shaman
--
Thierry Mallard |
GnuPG key on wwwkeys.pgp.net |
key 0xA3D021CB |
http://thierry.mallard.com |
- [Nel] NeL Network Engine, Olivier Cado, 2001/02/22
- Re: [Nel] NeL Network Engine, Nicolas Hognon, 2001/02/22
- Re: [Nel] NeL Network Engine,
Thierry Mallard <=
- Re: [Nel] NeL Network Engine, Vianney Lecroart, 2001/02/28
- Re: [Nel] NeL Network Engine, Nicolas Hognon, 2001/02/28
- Re: [Nel] NeL Network Engine, Vincent Caron, 2001/02/28
- Re: [Nel] NeL Network Engine, Nicolas Hognon, 2001/02/28
- Re: [Nel] NeL Network Engine, Vianney Lecroart, 2001/02/28
- Re: [Nel] NeL Network Engine, Vincent Caron, 2001/02/28
- Re: [Nel] NeL Network Engine, Nicolas Hognon, 2001/02/28
- Re: [Nel] NeL Network Engine, Zane, 2001/02/28
- Re: [Nel] NeL Network Engine, Nicolas Hognon, 2001/02/28
- Re: [Nel] NeL Network Engine, elijah wright, 2001/02/28