Archives are refreshed every 30 minutes - for details, please visit
the main index
.
You can also
download the archives in mbox format
.
guile-devel (date)
[
Thread Index
][
Top
][
All Lists
]
Advanced
[
Prev Period
]
Last Modified: Thu May 31 2001 19:17:58 -0400
Messages in reverse chronological order
[
Next Period
]
May 31, 2001
Re: Autoconf 2.50 compatibility.
,
Marius Vollmer
,
19:17
Re: scm_bits_t / scm_ubits_t
,
Marius Vollmer
,
18:44
Re: feature request
,
Marius Vollmer
,
18:44
Re: [patch] simple-print
,
Marius Vollmer
,
18:44
Re: RFC: major change to argument processing.
,
Marius Vollmer
,
18:44
Re: SCM_EVALIM2
,
Marius Vollmer
,
18:44
Re: eval-when and eval-case issues.
,
Marius Vollmer
,
18:44
Re: Autoconf 2.50 compatibility.
,
Rob Browning
,
18:33
Re: Autoconf 2.50 compatibility.
,
Dale P. Smith
,
17:45
Re: Autoconf 2.50 compatibility.
,
Marius Vollmer
,
17:19
Re: Autoconf 2.50 compatibility.
,
Lars J. Aas
,
10:24
Re: snarfing
,
Michael Livshin
,
10:08
Re: Autoconf 2.50 compatibility.
,
Tom Tromey
,
10:08
Re: Autoconf 2.50 compatibility.
,
Lars J. Aas
,
08:49
Re: Autoconf 2.50 compatibility.
,
Michael Livshin
,
08:41
Re: Autoconf 2.50 compatibility.
,
Lars J. Aas
,
08:09
Re: Autoconf 2.50 compatibility.
,
Michael Livshin
,
07:41
Re: Autoconf 2.50 compatibility.
,
Lars J. Aas
,
07:29
Re: Autoconf 2.50 compatibility.
,
Martin Grabmueller
,
07:19
Re: GRM: Scheme types into type index?
,
Dirk Herrmann
,
07:03
Re: [patch] simple-print
,
Daniel Skarda
,
07:00
Re: [patch] First round (request for discussion)
,
Daniel Skarda
,
06:49
Re: scm_bits_t / scm_ubits_t
,
Dirk Herrmann
,
04:11
Re: feature request
,
Dirk Herrmann
,
04:07
Re: SCM_EVALIM2
,
Dirk Herrmann
,
04:04
Re: GRM questions
,
Dirk Herrmann
,
03:58
Re: GRM questions
,
Dirk Herrmann
,
03:32
Re: RFC: major change to argument processing.
,
Rob Browning
,
01:35
Re: eval-when and eval-case issues.
,
Rob Browning
,
00:48
Re: eval-when and eval-case issues.
,
Evan Prodromou
,
00:25
Re: eval-when and eval-case issues.
,
Rob Browning
,
00:18
May 30, 2001
Re: feature request
,
Rob Browning
,
23:50
Re: Autoconf 2.50 compatibility.
,
Rob Browning
,
22:21
Re: snarfing
,
Marius Vollmer
,
21:08
Re: Autoconf 2.50 compatibility.
,
Marius Vollmer
,
21:08
Re: Autoconf 2.50 compatibility.
,
Marius Vollmer
,
21:08
Re: Autoconf 2.50 compatibility.
,
Marius Vollmer
,
21:08
Re: scm_bits_t / scm_ubits_t
,
Marius Vollmer
,
21:08
Re: SCM_EVALIM2
,
Marius Vollmer
,
21:08
Re: [patch] simple-print
,
Marius Vollmer
,
20:38
Re: eval-when and eval-case issues.
,
Marius Vollmer
,
20:38
Re: Proposal: Inclusion of `examples' directory in the distribution
,
Marius Vollmer
,
20:38
Re: read'ing/write'ing strings, and escape sequences
,
Marius Vollmer
,
20:38
Re: RFC: major change to argument processing.
,
Marius Vollmer
,
20:38
Re: G-WRAP
,
Marius Vollmer
,
20:38
Re: G-WRAP
,
Marius Vollmer
,
20:38
Re: [patch] First round (request for discussion)
,
Marius Vollmer
,
20:38
Re: feature request
,
Marius Vollmer
,
20:38
Re: Command line processing opens up can of worms :>
,
Marius Vollmer
,
20:38
Re: eval-when and eval-case issues.
,
Marius Vollmer
,
20:38
Re: GRM questions
,
Marius Vollmer
,
18:29
Re: GRM questions
,
Martin Grabmueller
,
17:12
Re: eval-when and eval-case issues.
,
Rob Browning
,
16:42
Re: eval-when and eval-case issues.
,
Marius Vollmer
,
16:30
GRM: Scheme types into type index?
,
Martin Grabmueller
,
16:23
More examples
,
Martin Grabmueller
,
13:36
Re: GRM questions
,
Dirk Herrmann
,
13:15
Re: Proposal: Inclusion of `examples' directory in the distribution
,
Jacques A. Vidrine
,
10:01
Re: Proposal: Inclusion of `examples' directory in the distribution
,
Thomas Wawrzinek
,
09:38
[patch] simple-print
,
Daniel Skarda
,
09:04
Re: Proposal: Inclusion of `examples' directory in the distribution
,
Martin Grabmueller
,
04:53
Re: Proposal: Inclusion of `examples' directory in the distribution
,
Thomas Wawrzinek
,
04:03
Re: G-WRAP
,
Rob Browning
,
01:41
Re: Proposal: Inclusion of `examples' directory in the distribution
,
Rob Browning
,
01:32
Confusing problems with (ice-9 syncase) and sc-expand3.
,
Rob Browning
,
00:39
May 29, 2001
eval-when and eval-case issues.
,
Rob Browning
,
20:37
Re: scm_string_hash suboptimal?
,
Rob Browning
,
20:25
Re: Command line processing opens up can of worms :>
,
Rob Browning
,
20:13
Re: scm_string_hash suboptimal?
,
Florian Weimer
,
17:41
Re: scm_string_hash suboptimal?
,
Florian Weimer
,
17:39
Re: scm_string_hash suboptimal?
,
Florian Weimer
,
17:13
Proposal: Inclusion of `examples' directory in the distribution
,
Martin Grabmueller
,
16:46
Re: Command line processing opens up can of worms :>
,
Marius Vollmer
,
16:33
Re: Command line processing opens up can of worms :>
,
Marius Vollmer
,
16:33
Re: scm_string_hash suboptimal?
,
Sam Tregar
,
15:16
GRM questions
,
Martin Grabmueller
,
15:00
Re: feature request
,
Jacques A. Vidrine
,
09:51
Re: feature request
,
Jacques A. Vidrine
,
09:09
Re: feature request
,
Lars J. Aas
,
08:47
Re: feature request
,
Michael Livshin
,
07:29
Re: feature request
,
Dirk Herrmann
,
06:53
Re: scm_string_hash suboptimal?
,
Dirk Herrmann
,
06:39
Re: Command line processing opens up can of worms :>
,
Dirk Herrmann
,
06:10
Re: scm_string_hash suboptimal?
,
Rob Browning
,
03:17
Re: Command line processing opens up can of worms :>
,
Rob Browning
,
01:23
Re: Command line processing opens up can of worms :>
,
Marius Vollmer
,
00:59
May 28, 2001
Re: feature request
,
Jacques A. Vidrine
,
23:53
Re: feature request
,
Dirk Herrmann
,
20:02
Re: scm_eval_string declared twice
,
Marius Vollmer
,
18:53
Re: feature request
,
Jacques A. Vidrine
,
18:06
scm_eval_string declared twice
,
Martin Grabmueller
,
14:39
Re: [patch] File names and line numbers in backtrace
,
Marius Vollmer
,
14:16
Re: feature request
,
Lars J. Aas
,
13:09
Re: feature request
,
Rob Browning
,
12:54
Re: snarfing
,
Martin Grabmueller
,
10:45
Re: Command line processing opens up can of worms :>
,
Martin Grabmueller
,
10:40
Re: spurious paren in srfi/srfi-19.scm
,
Michael Livshin
,
10:36
spurious paren in srfi/srfi-19.scm
,
Matthias Koeppe
,
08:04
Re: [patch] File names and line numbers in backtrace
,
Daniel Skarda
,
07:39
format and simple-format
,
Daniel Skarda
,
07:32
[patch] First round (request for discussion)
,
Daniel Skarda
,
07:23
Re: feature request
,
Michael Livshin
,
06:14
snarfing
,
Michael Livshin
,
05:45
Re: feature request
,
Michael Livshin
,
05:37
[hot !!] 해볼까?
,
이자영
,
03:56
Re: G-WRAP
,
Ariel Rios
,
00:38
Re: G-WRAP
,
Ariel Rios
,
00:37
Re: G-WRAP
,
Ariel Rios
,
00:36
May 27, 2001
gnome-guile 0.21pre is available
,
Ariel Rios
,
21:53
Re: Command line processing opens up can of worms :>
,
Rob Browning
,
20:08
Re: Command line processing opens up can of worms :>
,
Dirk Herrmann
,
19:56
Re: feature request
,
Dirk Herrmann
,
18:17
Re: Autoconf 2.50 compatibility.
,
Rob Browning
,
12:40
Re: SCM_EVALIM2
,
Dirk Herrmann
,
11:27
Re: scm_create_hook
,
Dirk Herrmann
,
11:26
Re: Autoconf 2.50 compatibility.
,
Dale P. Smith
,
08:07
Re: Autoconf 2.50 compatibility.
,
Michael Livshin
,
05:44
Re: Autoconf 2.50 compatibility.
,
Rob Browning
,
03:23
May 26, 2001
Command line processing opens up can of worms :>
,
Rob Browning
,
21:32
scm_create_hook
,
Michael Livshin
,
17:59
Re: scm_bits_t / scm_ubits_t
,
Jacques A. Vidrine
,
13:08
Re: scm_bits_t / scm_ubits_t
,
Rob Browning
,
10:30
Re: scm_bits_t / scm_ubits_t
,
Michael Livshin
,
09:24
Re: scm_bits_t / scm_ubits_t
,
Marius Vollmer
,
08:07
SCM_EVALIM2
,
Dirk Herrmann
,
06:22
May 25, 2001
Re: RFC: major change to argument processing.
,
Rob Browning
,
21:23
Re: scm_bits_t / scm_ubits_t
,
Michael Livshin
,
21:11
Re: scm_bits_t / scm_ubits_t
,
Marius Vollmer
,
20:38
Re: Autoconf 2.50 compatibility.
,
Michael Livshin
,
20:24
Autoconf 2.50 compatibility.
,
Rob Browning
,
20:05
Problems with new autoconf (might have fixes).
,
Rob Browning
,
19:35
Re: RFC: major change to argument processing.
,
Rob Browning
,
18:19
Re: Any way to check the equivalent of #ifdef MSDOS at scheme level?
,
Rob Browning
,
18:01
Re: Guile now has bonobo bindings working =)
,
ctest
,
14:53
Re: read'ing/write'ing strings, and escape sequences
,
Jacques A. Vidrine
,
12:30
scm_bits_t / scm_ubits_t
,
Dirk Herrmann
,
12:01
Re: (ice-9 format) and pretty print
,
Marius Vollmer
,
09:15
Re: Pictures in the manual
,
Marius Vollmer
,
09:15
Re: (ice-9 format) and pretty print
,
Dale P. Smith
,
07:50
Re: Smobs and setters?
,
Daniel Skarda
,
07:46
Re: Pictures in the manual
,
Martin Grabmueller
,
03:29
May 24, 2001
Re: Any way to check the equivalent of #ifdef MSDOS at scheme level?
,
Marius Vollmer
,
20:17
Re: [patch] File names and line numbers in backtrace
,
Marius Vollmer
,
20:17
Re: (ice-9 format) and pretty print
,
Marius Vollmer
,
20:17
Re: license ambiguity in guile exception to the gpl
,
Marius Vollmer
,
20:17
Re: On uninterned symbols
,
Marius Vollmer
,
20:17
Re: Uninterned symbols
,
Marius Vollmer
,
20:17
Re: Uninterned symbols
,
Marius Vollmer
,
20:17
Re: Uninterned symbols
,
Marius Vollmer
,
20:17
Re: Documentation
,
Marius Vollmer
,
20:17
Re: RFC: major change to argument processing.
,
Marius Vollmer
,
20:17
Re: Pictures in the manual
,
Marius Vollmer
,
20:17
Re: read'ing/write'ing strings, and escape sequences
,
Marius Vollmer
,
20:17
Re: license ambiguity in guile exception to the gpl
,
Neil W. Van Dyke
,
08:27
Re: RFC: major change to argument processing.
,
Dirk Herrmann
,
06:18
Re: feature request
,
Dirk Herrmann
,
06:14
Pictures in the manual
,
Martin Grabmueller
,
04:45
Guile now has bonobo bindings working =)
,
Ariel Rios
,
01:53
Re: Any way to check the equivalent of #ifdef MSDOS at scheme level?
,
Rob Browning
,
01:30
May 23, 2001
Re: G-WRAP
,
Marius Vollmer
,
22:06
Re: Any way to check the equivalent of #ifdef MSDOS at scheme level?
,
Marius Vollmer
,
22:06
Re: SRFI-19 patch, or: strange syncase implications
,
Rob Browning
,
13:06
Re: SRFI-19 patch, or: strange syncase implications
,
Jacques A. Vidrine
,
12:49
SRFI-19 patch, or: strange syncase implications
,
Matthias Koeppe
,
11:26
Re: Syntax errors in srfi-19.scm when :keywords are read
,
Rob Browning
,
11:25
read'ing/write'ing strings, and escape sequences
,
Jacques A. Vidrine
,
08:42
Re: Should SCM_CONST_LONG be deprecated?
,
Dale P. Smith
,
07:24
Syntax errors in srfi-19.scm when :keywords are read
,
Matthias Koeppe
,
05:41
Re: G-WRAP
,
Rob Browning
,
02:52
RFC: major change to argument processing.
,
Rob Browning
,
02:50
Re: On cond-expand, once again
,
Martin Grabmueller
,
01:10
Re: New command line option --use-srfi
,
Martin Grabmueller
,
01:09
May 22, 2001
G-WRAP
,
Ariel Rios
,
23:14
Any way to check the equivalent of #ifdef MSDOS at scheme level?
,
Rob Browning
,
22:52
HP스캐너,프린터,화상카메라가 꽁짜!!!
,
교육담당자
,
22:14
Re: Should SCM_CONST_LONG be deprecated?
,
Marius Vollmer
,
19:42
Re: where are the following functions defined?
,
Michael Livshin
,
18:54
Re: Should SCM_CONST_LONG be deprecated?
,
Marius Vollmer
,
18:45
Re: script.c -- job sizing...
,
Marius Vollmer
,
18:45
Re: Problems with deprecated functions
,
Marius Vollmer
,
18:45
Re: where are the following functions defined?
,
Marius Vollmer
,
18:45
Re: On cond-expand, once again
,
Marius Vollmer
,
18:45
Re: Minor problems with CVS Guile
,
Marius Vollmer
,
18:45
Re: New command line option --use-srfi
,
Marius Vollmer
,
18:45
Re: New command line option --use-srfi
,
Marius Vollmer
,
18:45
Re: Creating modules from C
,
Marius Vollmer
,
18:45
Re: New command line option --use-srfi
,
Rob Browning
,
15:15
Re: Creating modules from C
,
Matthias Koeppe
,
12:05
Minor problems with CVS Guile
,
Matthias Koeppe
,
11:55
On cond-expand, once again
,
Martin Grabmueller
,
11:28
Re: New command line option --use-srfi
,
Martin Grabmueller
,
10:18
Re: New command line option --use-srfi
,
Martin Grabmueller
,
10:12
May 21, 2001
Re: New command line option --use-srfi
,
Marius Vollmer
,
18:27
Re: New command line option --use-srfi
,
Rob Browning
,
17:20
Re: New command line option --use-srfi
,
Martin Grabmueller
,
15:22
[patch] File names and line numbers in backtrace
,
Daniel Skarda
,
12:41
Smobs and setters?
,
Daniel Skarda
,
11:26
(ice-9 format) and pretty print
,
Daniel Skarda
,
10:55
Re: How close is everyone to ready for the stable branch?
,
Lars J. Aas
,
09:26
Re: Build probs under Solaris
,
Martin Grabmueller
,
09:22
Re: rfc: `process-define-module': function -> macro ?
,
Lars J. Aas
,
09:17
where are the following functions defined?
,
Michael Livshin
,
09:11
Should SCM_CONST_LONG be deprecated?
,
Dale P. Smith
,
03:02
Re: script.c -- job sizing...
,
Rob Browning
,
00:03
May 20, 2001
Problems with deprecated functions
,
Ariel Rios
,
22:50
Re: rfc: `process-define-module': function -> macro ?
,
Marius Vollmer
,
21:17
Re: small and stupid patch to procs.c
,
Marius Vollmer
,
21:15
Re: script.c -- job sizing...
,
Marius Vollmer
,
21:04
Re: license ambiguity in guile exception to the gpl
,
Marius Vollmer
,
21:04
Re: numbers.h: two more things
,
Marius Vollmer
,
21:04
Re: numbers.h: extern SCM scm_{long,ulong,long_long}2big
,
Marius Vollmer
,
21:04
Re: rfc: `process-define-module': function -> macro ?
,
Marius Vollmer
,
21:04
small and stupid patch to procs.c
,
Ariel Rios
,
20:42
Re: scm_string_hash suboptimal?
,
Rob Browning
,
17:09
Re: Loading Guile `Extensions'
,
Rob Browning
,
17:07
Re: scm_string_hash suboptimal?
,
Florian Weimer
,
15:53
feature request
,
Han-Wen Nienhuys
,
14:53
Re: Loading Guile `Extensions'
,
Marius Vollmer
,
13:18
Re: scm_string_hash suboptimal?
,
Rob Browning
,
11:42
Re: Loading Guile `Extensions'
,
thi
,
11:39
Re: uvect & ivect: uniform vector of long or int?
,
Masao Uebayashi
,
09:47
scm_string_hash suboptimal?
,
Florian Weimer
,
06:47
May 19, 2001
Wow. May have fixed hobbit top-level dotted lambda bug.
,
Rob Browning
,
23:31
Re: Loading Guile `Extensions'
,
Rob Browning
,
21:55
Re: How close is everyone to ready for the stable branch?
,
Rob Browning
,
21:54
Loading Guile `Extensions'
,
Marius Vollmer
,
21:03
Re: How close is everyone to ready for the stable branch?
,
Marius Vollmer
,
18:59
Re: How close is everyone to ready for the stable branch?
,
Michael Livshin
,
18:33
Re: numbers.h: two more things
,
Michael Livshin
,
18:20
How close is everyone to ready for the stable branch?
,
Rob Browning
,
17:29
Re: New command line option --use-srfi
,
Marius Vollmer
,
16:32
Re: uvect & ivect: uniform vector of long or int?
,
Rob Browning
,
15:44
Re: uvect & ivect: uniform vector of long or int?
,
Michael Livshin
,
13:10
Re: uvect & ivect: uniform vector of long or int?
,
Eric Moore
,
12:53
uvect & ivect: uniform vector of long or int?
,
Michael Livshin
,
12:49
script.c -- job sizing...
,
Rob Browning
,
11:51
Re: New command line option --use-srfi
,
Rob Browning
,
11:39
Re: New command line option --use-srfi
,
Marius Vollmer
,
07:02
May 18, 2001
Re: Lazy catch behaviour
,
Marius Vollmer
,
22:02
Re: Lazy catch behaviour
,
Neil Jerram
,
19:09
Re: rfc: `process-define-module': function -> macro ?
,
thi
,
14:05
Re: rfc: `process-define-module': function -> macro ?
,
Lars J. Aas
,
13:05
Re: New command line option --use-srfi
,
Marius Vollmer
,
08:21
Re: Uninterned symbols
,
Juho Östman
,
07:03
Re: numbers.h: extern SCM scm_{long,ulong,long_long}2big
,
Dirk Herrmann
,
05:03
Re: New command line option --use-srfi
,
Martin Grabmueller
,
01:12
Re: Uninterned symbols
,
Martin Grabmueller
,
01:08
Re: numbers.h: extern SCM scm_{long,ulong,long_long}2big
,
Martin Grabmueller
,
01:05
Re: On uninterned symbols
,
Martin Grabmueller
,
01:03
May 17, 2001
Re: New command line option --use-srfi
,
Marius Vollmer
,
23:51
Re: New command line option --use-srfi
,
Marius Vollmer
,
23:51
Re: When should eval-when eval?
,
Marius Vollmer
,
23:51
Re: Uninterned symbols
,
Michael Livshin
,
23:16
Re: On uninterned symbols
,
Marius Vollmer
,
18:34
Re: On uninterned symbols
,
Marius Vollmer
,
18:34
Re: Uninterned symbols
,
Marius Vollmer
,
18:34
numbers.h: two more things
,
Michael Livshin
,
18:08
numbers.h: extern SCM scm_{long,ulong,long_long}2big
,
Michael Livshin
,
17:49
Re: On uninterned symbols
,
Martin Grabmueller
,
17:04
Re: On uninterned symbols
,
Michael Livshin
,
06:35
license ambiguity in guile exception to the gpl
,
Neil W. Van Dyke
,
06:14
Re: On uninterned symbols
,
Martin Grabmueller
,
06:09
rfc: `process-define-module': function -> macro ?
,
thi
,
05:42
Re: On uninterned symbols
,
Michael Livshin
,
04:10
On uninterned symbols
,
Martin Grabmueller
,
01:43
May 16, 2001
Re: Is my procedure getting GCed?
,
Neil Jerram
,
15:42
Re: Is my procedure getting GCed?
,
Michael Livshin
,
15:35
Re: Is my procedure getting GCed?
,
Neil Jerram
,
15:23
Re: Rogue Pointer
,
Dale P. Smith
,
14:42
Re: Bug in hobbit?
,
Rob Browning
,
12:58
Bug in hobbit?
,
Rob Browning
,
12:16
Re: When should eval-when eval?
,
Rob Browning
,
11:13
Re: namespace problem for imported variables
,
Neil W. Van Dyke
,
08:33
Re: When should eval-when eval?
,
Marius Vollmer
,
03:36
Re: What do people think about g-wrap going in to a CVS module?
,
Ariel Rios
,
01:11
When should eval-when eval?
,
Rob Browning
,
01:04
May 15, 2001
Please remove cpp_*_symbols.c and rebuild.
,
Marius Vollmer
,
21:04
Re: New command line option --use-srfi
,
Rob Browning
,
20:46
Re: ok, here's what i'll do
,
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
,
18:39
Re: New command line option --use-srfi
,
Marius Vollmer
,
17:39
Re: Is my procedure getting GCed?
,
Michael Livshin
,
17:27
Re: Is my procedure getting GCed?
,
Neil Jerram
,
17:23
Re: Lazy catch behaviour
,
Neil Jerram
,
17:23
Re: mvo-vcell-cleanup-1-branch merged, please test
,
Michael Livshin
,
17:23
Re: New command line option --use-srfi
,
Rob Browning
,
17:18
Re: mvo-vcell-cleanup-1-branch merged, please test
,
Marius Vollmer
,
17:03
Re: mvo-vcell-cleanup-1-branch merged, please test
,
Martin Grabmueller
,
16:10
New command line option --use-srfi
,
Martin Grabmueller
,
16:10
Re: Is my procedure getting GCed?
,
Marius Vollmer
,
14:53
Re: mvo-vcell-cleanup-1-branch merged, please test
,
Dale P. Smith
,
12:45
Re: mvo-vcell-cleanup-1-branch merged, please test
,
Dirk Herrmann
,
11:57
mvo-vcell-cleanup-1-branch merged, please test
,
Marius Vollmer
,
11:24
Re: Is my procedure getting GCed?
,
Dirk Herrmann
,
11:23
Re: Is my procedure getting GCed?
,
Dirk Herrmann
,
11:19
Re: size_t & unsigned long
,
Marius Vollmer
,
10:04
Re: namespace problem for imported variables
,
Marius Vollmer
,
10:04
new `resolve-interface'
,
Marius Vollmer
,
10:04
Re: Creating modules from C
,
Marius Vollmer
,
10:04
Re: Is my procedure getting GCed?
,
Marius Vollmer
,
10:04
Re: Should I add cond-expand to boot-9.scm?
,
Marius Vollmer
,
10:04
Re: Is my procedure getting GCed?
,
Michael Livshin
,
05:56
Re: Rogue Pointer
,
Dirk Herrmann
,
05:54
namespace problem for imported variables
,
Neil W. Van Dyke
,
05:15
Re: Creating modules from C
,
Lars J. Aas
,
03:44
Re: Should I add cond-expand to boot-9.scm?
,
Martin Grabmueller
,
00:27
May 14, 2001
Re: Should I add cond-expand to boot-9.scm?
,
Rob Browning
,
22:52
Re: Creating modules from C
,
Dirk Herrmann
,
21:15
Re: Creating modules from C
,
Dirk Herrmann
,
21:14
Re: Should I add cond-expand to boot-9.scm?
,
Marius Vollmer
,
21:12
getter with setter from C
,
Dale P. Smith
,
21:11
Re: Can we make the *-version functions more consistent?
,
Marius Vollmer
,
21:03
Re: Creating modules from C
,
Marius Vollmer
,
21:03
Re: Can we make the *-version functions more consistent?
,
Dirk Herrmann
,
21:02
Re: Rogue Pointer
,
Dirk Herrmann
,
20:59
Re: Patch for better multiple values support
,
Marius Vollmer
,
20:46
Re: Please remove the libtool.m4 copy from acinclude.m4
,
Marius Vollmer
,
20:46
Re: ok, here's what i'll do
,
Marius Vollmer
,
20:46
Re: Creating modules from C
,
Marius Vollmer
,
20:46
Re: deprecation related macro names
,
Marius Vollmer
,
20:46
Re: Creating modules from C
,
Marius Vollmer
,
20:46
Re: obsolete (?) stuff in boot-9
,
Marius Vollmer
,
20:46
Re: Lazy catch behaviour
,
Marius Vollmer
,
20:46
Re: Lazy catch behaviour
,
Marius Vollmer
,
20:46
Re: Should I add cond-expand to boot-9.scm?
,
Marius Vollmer
,
20:46
Re: Creating modules from C
,
Dirk Herrmann
,
20:43
Re: Creating modules from C (was: On the deprecated auto-loading of compiled-code modules)
,
NIIBE Yutaka
,
20:07
Re: Can we make the *-version functions more consistent?
,
Evan Prodromou
,
19:09
Re: Creating modules from C
,
Marius Vollmer
,
19:03
Re: Can we make the *-version functions more consistent?
,
Marius Vollmer
,
19:03
Re: What's the status of modules and macros?
,
Marius Vollmer
,
18:21
Re: Creating modules from C
,
Marius Vollmer
,
18:21
Can we make the *-version functions more consistent?
,
Rob Browning
,
17:27
Re: Rogue Pointer
,
Michael Livshin
,
16:47
Re: Rogue Pointer
,
Dale P. Smith
,
16:44
Re: Rogue Pointer
,
Dale P. Smith
,
16:32
Re: Should I add cond-expand to boot-9.scm?
,
Rob Browning
,
15:53
Re: Stable branch on May 21 feasible?
,
Martin Grabmueller
,
15:07
Re: Creating modules from C
,
Martin Grabmueller
,
15:07
Re: The GH interface. (was: Patch for gh.h)
,
Neil Jerram
,
15:00
Re: The GH interface. (was: Patch for gh.h)
,
Neil Jerram
,
15:00
Re: Should I add cond-expand to boot-9.scm?
,
Martin Grabmueller
,
14:09
Are port-column and port-line maintained by writes?
,
Matthias Koeppe
,
13:03
guile-devel ȳϼ?
,
¶ڸ
,
12:50
Re: Creating modules from C
,
Dirk Herrmann
,
11:29
Re: Creating modules from C
,
Alex Shinn
,
11:09
Re: What's the status of modules and macros?
,
Rob Browning
,
10:55
Re: Creating modules from C
,
Rob Browning
,
10:46
deprecation related macro names
,
Dirk Herrmann
,
10:35
Re: What's the status of modules and macros?
,
Marius Vollmer
,
10:14
Re: Creating modules from C
,
Marius Vollmer
,
10:14
Re: Rogue Pointer
,
Dirk Herrmann
,
08:26
Re: Rogue Pointer
,
Michael Livshin
,
08:21
Re: using SCM_SMOB_PREDICATE during GC
,
Michael Livshin
,
08:13
using SCM_SMOB_PREDICATE during GC
,
Lars J. Aas
,
07:17
Rogue Pointer
,
Dale P. Smith
,
06:41
Re: Creating modules from C (was: On the deprecated auto-loading of compiled-code modules)
,
Matthias Koeppe
,
06:33
Re: The GH interface. (was: Patch for gh.h)
,
Lars J. Aas
,
06:33
Re: The GH interface. (was: Patch for gh.h)
,
Dirk Herrmann
,
04:46
Re: Do we have anything like a TODO file?
,
Dirk Herrmann
,
04:24
Re: thoughts about 1.6 release
,
Ariel Rios
,
01:18
Re: thoughts about 1.6 release
,
Rob Browning
,
00:44
thoughts about 1.6 release
,
Ariel Rios
,
00:03
May 13, 2001
Re: What's the status of modules and macros?
,
Rob Browning
,
22:15
Re: What's the status of modules and macros?
,
Rob Browning
,
21:27
Re: What's the status of modules and macros?
,
Rob Browning
,
21:26
Re: Documentation
,
Neil Jerram
,
19:54
Re: What's the status of modules and macros?
,
Marius Vollmer
,
19:22
Re: What's the status of modules and macros?
,
Marius Vollmer
,
19:22
Re: What's the status of modules and macros?
,
Marius Vollmer
,
19:22
What do people think about g-wrap going in to a CVS module?
,
Rob Browning
,
19:04
Re: Stable branch on May 21 feasible?
,
Rob Browning
,
18:56
Re: Stable branch on May 21 feasible?
,
Neil Jerram
,
17:01
Re: What's the status of modules and macros?
,
Rob Browning
,
13:35
Re: What's the status of modules and macros?
,
Michael Livshin
,
13:15
Re: What's the status of modules and macros?
,
Rob Browning
,
13:04
Re: What's the status of modules and macros?
,
Marius Vollmer
,
13:02
Re: The GH interface. (was: Patch for gh.h)
,
Rob Browning
,
12:29
Re: What's the status of modules and macros?
,
Rob Browning
,
12:15
Re: Do we have anything like a TODO file?
,
Rob Browning
,
11:53
Re: Do we have anything like a TODO file?
,
Rob Browning
,
11:37
Re: Stable branch on May 21 feasible?
,
Rob Browning
,
11:36
Re: Documentation
,
Rob Browning
,
11:33
Re: Stable branch on May 21 feasible?
,
Marius Vollmer
,
10:47
Re: What's the status of modules and macros?
,
Marius Vollmer
,
10:47
Re: obsolete (?) stuff in boot-9
,
Marius Vollmer
,
10:47
Re: Do we have anything like a TODO file?
,
thi
,
07:54
Re: Documentation
,
thi
,
07:40
Re: Do we have anything like a TODO file?
,
Neil Jerram
,
07:13
Re: Documentation
,
Neil Jerram
,
07:13
Re: The GH interface. (was: Patch for gh.h)
,
Neil Jerram
,
07:12
Re: The GH interface. (was: Patch for gh.h)
,
Neil Jerram
,
07:12
Re: Stable branch on May 21 feasible?
,
Neil Jerram
,
07:12
Re: Do we have anything like a TODO file?
,
thi
,
04:50
Re: size_t & unsigned long
,
Dirk Herrmann
,
04:41
Re: Do we have anything like a TODO file?
,
Dirk Herrmann
,
04:27
Re: obsolete (?) stuff in boot-9
,
Dirk Herrmann
,
04:17
Re: Do we have anything like a TODO file?
,
thi
,
04:14
May 12, 2001
Re: Do we have a standard for error checking/handling?
,
Rob Browning
,
17:52
Re: Do we have a standard for error checking/handling?
,
Sam Tregar
,
17:37
Do we have anything like a TODO file?
,
Rob Browning
,
17:37
Stable branch on May 21 feasible?
,
Rob Browning
,
17:30
What's the status of modules and macros?
,
Rob Browning
,
17:27
Re: Planning work
,
Rob Browning
,
17:23
Re: Documentation
,
Rob Browning
,
15:50
Re: obsolete (?) stuff in boot-9
,
Marius Vollmer
,
10:17
Re: obsolete (?) stuff in boot-9
,
Rob Browning
,
01:39
May 11, 2001
Re: doc snarfing ...
,
Bruce Korb
,
20:35
Re: doc snarfing does not work with Sun Forte preprocessor
,
Rob Browning
,
19:07
Re: doc snarfing does not work with Sun Forte preprocessor
,
Neil Jerram
,
18:49
Re: doc snarfing does not work with Sun Forte preprocessor
,
thi
,
16:11
Re: doc snarfing does not work with Sun Forte preprocessor
,
Rob Browning
,
14:59
Re: doc snarfing does not work with Sun Forte preprocessor
,
Jim Blandy
,
13:30
Re: Lazy catch behaviour
,
Neil Jerram
,
13:11
Re: Should I add cond-expand to boot-9.scm?
,
Rob Browning
,
12:27
Lazy catch behaviour
,
Neil Jerram
,
11:52
Re: size_t & unsigned long
,
Masao Uebayashi
,
11:27
Re: size_t & unsigned long
,
Michael Livshin
,
11:26
Re: any lr(1) wizards still there?
,
Neil Jerram
,
11:23
Re: size_t & unsigned long
,
Dirk Herrmann
,
11:14
Re: Should I add cond-expand to boot-9.scm?
,
Neil Jerram
,
11:08
size_t & unsigned long
,
Michael Livshin
,
10:58
Re: any lr(1) wizards still there?
,
Neil Jerram
,
08:18
compilation: Expanding macros didn't do what I thought...
,
Rob Browning
,
02:04
Re: Should I add cond-expand to boot-9.scm?
,
Martin Grabmueller
,
01:39
May 10, 2001
Re: doc snarfing does not work with Sun Forte preprocessor
,
Neil Jerram
,
19:54
fyi: boot-9.scm `%autoloader-maintainer-mode' deleted
,
thi
,
18:27
Re: Should I add cond-expand to boot-9.scm?
,
Marius Vollmer
,
18:24
Re: Should I add cond-expand to boot-9.scm?
,
Rob Browning
,
17:29
Re: New branch: mvo-vcell-cleanup-1-branch
,
Martin Grabmueller
,
16:32
Should I add cond-expand to boot-9.scm?
,
Martin Grabmueller
,
16:32
Re: Patch for better multiple values support
,
Rob Browning
,
15:10
Re: Patch for better multiple values support
,
Matthias Koeppe
,
11:40
Re: Patch for better multiple values support
,
Keisuke Nishida
,
10:32
Re: Patch for better multiple values support
,
Michael Livshin
,
07:57
Re: Patch for better multiple values support
,
Martin Grabmueller
,
07:35
write back when you can 32581
,
customercare217
,
05:48
Patch for better multiple values support
,
Matthias Koeppe
,
05:24
Re: doc snarfing does not work with Sun Forte preprocessor
,
Michael Livshin
,
01:58
May 09, 2001
Re: Planning work
,
Rob Browning
,
23:44
New branch: mvo-vcell-cleanup-1-branch
,
Marius Vollmer
,
20:55
Re: EVAL should not destructively modify its first argument
,
thi
,
20:05
Re: EVAL should not destructively modify its first argument
,
thi
,
19:47
Re: ok, here's what i'll do
,
Neil Jerram
,
18:51
Re: doc snarfing does not work with Sun Forte preprocessor
,
Neil Jerram
,
18:51
Re: Planning work
,
Rob Browning
,
18:07
any lr(1) wizards still there?
,
Martin Grabmueller
,
17:58
Re: EVAL should not destructively modify its first argument
,
Marius Vollmer
,
17:54
Re: guile-vm 0.4
,
Marius Vollmer
,
16:27
Re: Creating modules from C (was: On the deprecated auto-loading of compiled-code modules)
,
thi
,
15:55
Re: doc snarfing does not work with Sun Forte preprocessor
,
thi
,
15:23
Re: module naming
,
thi
,
15:01
Re: module naming
,
thi
,
15:01
Re: Planning work
,
Rob Browning
,
14:51
EVAL should not destructively modify its first argument
,
Matthias Koeppe
,
13:41
Re: Small portability patch for CVS Guile
,
Michael Livshin
,
12:12
Re: Creating modules from C (was: On the deprecated auto-loading of compiled-code modules)
,
Martin Grabmueller
,
12:00
Re: doc snarfing does not work with Sun Forte preprocessor
,
Michael Livshin
,
11:58
Re: guile-vm 0.4
,
Martin Grabmueller
,
10:39
Re: Creating modules from C (was: On the deprecated auto-loading of compiled-code modules)
,
Martin Grabmueller
,
10:39
Re: ok, here's what i'll do
,
Rob Browning
,
10:09
Small portability patch for CVS Guile
,
Matthias Koeppe
,
09:00
doc snarfing does not work with Sun Forte preprocessor
,
Matthias Koeppe
,
08:40
Creating modules from C (was: On the deprecated auto-loading of compiled-code modules)
,
Matthias Koeppe
,
07:07
ok, here's what i'll do
,
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
,
01:59
Re: Planning work
,
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
,
01:49
Re: Planning work
,
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
,
01:47
May 08, 2001
Re: The GH interface. (was: Patch for gh.h)
,
Rob Browning
,
23:18
Re: Module system docs
,
Marius Vollmer
,
20:51
Re: Module system docs
,
Dirk Herrmann
,
18:15
Re: The GH interface. (was: Patch for gh.h)
,
Dirk Herrmann
,
17:58
Re: Module system docs
,
Neil Jerram
,
14:12
Re: Should we move/copy/symlink ice-9/srfi-8.scm to srfi/srfi-8.scm?
,
Rob Browning
,
13:25
Re: 1.6.0 actions from RELEASE nearly finished.
,
Rob Browning
,
13:25
Re: Module system docs
,
Rob Browning
,
13:18
Re: 1.6.0 actions from RELEASE nearly finished.
,
Rob Browning
,
13:16
Re: The GH interface. (was: Patch for gh.h)
,
Rob Browning
,
13:10
Please remove the libtool.m4 copy from acinclude.m4
,
Matthias Koeppe
,
12:52
Re: The GH interface. (was: Patch for gh.h)
,
Keisuke Nishida
,
12:34
Re: guile-vm 0.4
,
Dirk Herrmann
,
10:22
Re: Handling deprecated features
,
Dirk Herrmann
,
10:14
Re: Module system docs
,
Marius Vollmer
,
08:04
Re: The GH interface. (was: Patch for gh.h)
,
Marius Vollmer
,
08:04
Re: Handling deprecated features
,
Marius Vollmer
,
08:04
Re: 1.6.0 actions from RELEASE nearly finished.
,
Dirk Herrmann
,
06:28
Re: Handling deprecated features
,
Dirk Herrmann
,
04:54
Re: The GH interface. (was: Patch for gh.h)
,
Dirk Herrmann
,
03:21
Re: Should we move/copy/symlink ice-9/srfi-8.scm to srfi/srfi-8.scm?
,
Dirk Herrmann
,
02:52
Re: Module system docs
,
Dirk Herrmann
,
02:02
May 07, 2001
Re: Problems with test-suites and modules
,
thi
,
20:01
Re: Guile module system documentation committed
,
Neil Jerram
,
18:34
Re: Problems with test-suites and modules
,
Martin Grabmueller
,
18:27
Re: Problems with test-suites and modules
,
thi
,
18:01
Problems with test-suites and modules
,
Martin Grabmueller
,
17:43
Guile module system documentation committed
,
Martin Grabmueller
,
15:38
Re: 1.6.0 release update.
,
Martin Grabmueller
,
12:03
Re: 1.6.0 release update.
,
Rob Browning
,
09:57
Re: module naming
,
Rob Browning
,
09:51
Re: module naming
,
Rob Browning
,
09:51
Re: GUILE_DEBUG and SCM_DEBUG
,
Dirk Herrmann
,
09:18
Re: Patch for gh.h
,
Lars J. Aas
,
09:11
Re: 1.6.0 actions from RELEASE nearly finished.
,
Dirk Herrmann
,
08:27
Re: module naming
,
Marius Vollmer
,
07:47
Re: 1.6.0 release update.
,
thi
,
04:44
Re: 1.6.0 release update.
,
thi
,
04:44
Re: Module system documentation
,
thi
,
04:44
Re: module naming
,
thi
,
04:44
Re: Guile compilation (getting started playing around)
,
thi
,
04:44
Re: 1.6.0 release update.
,
thi
,
04:44
May 06, 2001
Re: Planning work
,
Keisuke Nishida
,
20:10
Re: module naming
,
Rob Browning
,
19:26
Re: array-equal?
,
Marius Vollmer
,
18:16
Re: Guile compilation (getting started playing around)
,
thi
,
16:47
Re: Guile compilation (getting started playing around)
,
Rob Browning
,
16:17
Re: Guile compilation (getting started playing around)
,
Marius Vollmer
,
16:07
Re: Planning work
,
Marius Vollmer
,
16:07
Re: Planning work
,
Rob Browning
,
14:28
Re: Planning work
,
Keisuke Nishida
,
14:08
Re: Planning work
,
Keisuke Nishida
,
13:57
Hobbit copyrights -- investigating.
,
Rob Browning
,
13:50
Guile compilation (getting started playing around)
,
Rob Browning
,
13:39
Re: (use-modules (srfi srfi-19)) now available.
,
Rob Browning
,
12:31
Re: (use-modules (srfi srfi-19)) now available.
,
thi
,
04:57
May 05, 2001
Do we have a standard for error checking/handling?
,
Rob Browning
,
23:44
(use-modules (srfi srfi-19)) now available.
,
Rob Browning
,
23:37
Re: Planning work
,
Rob Browning
,
22:58
Re: Module system documentation
,
Marius Vollmer
,
21:48
Re: Handling deprecated features
,
Marius Vollmer
,
21:24
Re: On the deprecated auto-loading of compiled-code modules
,
Marius Vollmer
,
21:24
Re: Planning work
,
Marius Vollmer
,
21:24
Re: Module system documentation
,
Marius Vollmer
,
21:24
Re: Planning work
,
Marius Vollmer
,
21:24
Re: Planning work
,
Rob Browning
,
12:25
Re: Planning work
,
Michael Livshin
,
10:49
Re: Planning work
,
Martin Grabmueller
,
10:44
Re: Planning work
,
Rob Browning
,
10:44
Re: Planning work
,
Rob Browning
,
10:29
Difference between use-syntax and use-modules?
,
Neil Jerram
,
09:21
May 04, 2001
Re: 1.6.0 release update.
,
Neil Jerram
,
18:27
Re: The GH interface. (was: Patch for gh.h)
,
Neil Jerram
,
18:12
Re: Planning work
,
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
,
17:55
Re: Planning work
,
Chris Cramer
,
17:51
Re: add guile-tools?
,
thi
,
16:48
Re: Planning work
,
Marius Vollmer
,
10:38
Re: 1.6.0 release update.
,
Ian Grant
,
05:09
Re: Planning work
,
Martin Grabmueller
,
03:07
Re: Planning work
,
Rob Browning
,
01:04
Re: 1.6.0 release update.
,
Martin Grabmueller
,
00:54
May 03, 2001
Re: 1.6.0 release update.
,
Rob Browning
,
21:58
Re: 1.6.0 release update.
,
Rob Browning
,
21:45
Re: 1.6.0 release update.
,
thi
,
21:01
Re: 1.6.0 release update.
,
thi
,
20:53
Re: 1.6.0 release update.
,
Lars J. Aas
,
16:45
Re: 1.6.0 release update.
,
Martin Grabmueller
,
15:24
Re: 1.6.0 release update.
,
Rob Browning
,
14:30
Re: The GH interface. (was: Patch for gh.h)
,
Martin Grabmueller
,
14:19
Re: Module system documentation
,
Martin Grabmueller
,
14:15
Re: 1.6.0 release update.
,
Martin Grabmueller
,
14:12
Re: 1.6.0 release update.
,
Martin Grabmueller
,
14:10
Re: The GH interface. (was: Patch for gh.h)
,
Rob Browning
,
14:08
GLAME featured in LWN
,
Neil Jerram
,
14:00
Re: The GH interface. (was: Patch for gh.h)
,
Dale P. Smith
,
13:56
1.6.0 release update.
,
Rob Browning
,
13:42
Re: The GH interface. (was: Patch for gh.h)
,
Rob Browning
,
13:36
Re: The GH interface. (was: Patch for gh.h)
,
Rob Browning
,
12:59
Re: Module system documentation
,
Rob Browning
,
12:55
Re: On the deprecated auto-loading of compiled-code modules
,
Rob Browning
,
12:53
Re: Handling deprecated features
,
Rob Browning
,
12:50
Re: array-equal?
,
Masao Uebayashi
,
11:35
May 02, 2001
Re: The GH interface. (was: Patch for gh.h)
,
Neil Jerram
,
20:15
Re: Handling deprecated features
,
Neil Jerram
,
20:15
Re: Should we move/copy/symlink ice-9/srfi-8.scm to srfi/srfi-8.scm?
,
Neil Jerram
,
20:15
Re: Documenting debug facilities
,
thi
,
19:28
Re: Planning work
,
Lars J. Aas
,
15:53
Re: Planning work
,
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
,
14:20
Re: add guile-tools?
,
thi
,
13:39
Re: SRFI-10 and #.
,
Martin Grabmueller
,
10:43
Module system documentation
,
Martin Grabmueller
,
10:43
Re: On the deprecated auto-loading of compiled-code modules
,
Matthias Koeppe
,
10:16
Re: On the deprecated auto-loading of compiled-code modules
,
Martin Grabmueller
,
09:25
Re: On the deprecated auto-loading of compiled-code modules
,
Marius Vollmer
,
08:44
Re: Planning work
,
Marius Vollmer
,
08:44
Re: On the deprecated auto-loading of compiled-code modules
,
Matthias Koeppe
,
07:35
Re: The GH interface. (was: Patch for gh.h)
,
Martin Grabmueller
,
05:16
Re: The GH interface. (was: Patch for gh.h)
,
Chris Cramer
,
02:42
Re: The GH interface. (was: Patch for gh.h)
,
Rob Browning
,
00:25
Re: The GH interface. (was: Patch for gh.h)
,
Ariel Rios
,
00:09
May 01, 2001
Re: The GH interface. (was: Patch for gh.h)
,
Rob Browning
,
23:48
Re: Planning work
,
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
,
21:59
Re: Planning work
,
Marius Vollmer
,
21:28
GUILE_DEBUG and SCM_DEBUG
,
Marius Vollmer
,
20:56
Planning work
,
NIIBE Yutaka
,
20:36
Re: Planning work
,
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
,
20:34
Re: Planning work
,
Thomas Bushnell, BSG
,
18:16
Re: Documenting debug facilities
,
Neil Jerram
,
17:11
Re: Planning work
,
Marius Vollmer
,
17:11
The GH interface. (was: Patch for gh.h)
,
Marius Vollmer
,
17:00
Re: add guile-tools?
,
Marius Vollmer
,
17:00
Re: Should we move/copy/symlink ice-9/srfi-8.scm to srfi/srfi-8.scm?
,
Marius Vollmer
,
15:20
Re: On the deprecated auto-loading of compiled-code modules
,
Marius Vollmer
,
15:20
Re: Handling deprecated features
,
Marius Vollmer
,
15:20
add guile-tools?
,
thi
,
05:16
[
Prev Period
]
[
Next Period
]
Mail converted by
MHonArc